Cited by 71Advanced Causal Inference TechniquesBayesian Modeling and Causal InferenceSimulation Techniques and Applications

Causal discovery in social media using quasi-experimental designs

Oktay, Hüseyin, Taylor, Brian J., Jensen, David D.·2010·Proceedings of the First Workshop on Social Media Analytics

Abstract

Social media systems have become increasingly attractive to both users and companies providing those systems. Efficient management of these systems is essential and requires knowledge of cause-and-effect relationships within the system. Online experimentation can be used to discover causal knowledge; however, this ignores the observational data that is already being collected for operational purposes. Quasi-experimental designs (QEDs) are commonly used in social sciences to discover causal knowledge from observational data, and QEDs can be exploited to discover causal knowledge about social media systems. In this paper, we apply three different QEDs to demonstrate how one can gain a causal understanding of a social media system. The conclusions drawn from using a QED can have threats to their validity, but we show how one can carefully construct sophisticated designs to overcome some of those threats.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1145/1964858.1964859

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Different strategies to identify a control group may lead to different degrees of similarity among the treated users and the control group, and, thus, to different estimates of the treatment effect.

    “different strategies may lead to different degrees of similarity among the treated users and the control group, and, thus, to different estimates of the treatment effect (Oktay et al., 2010).”

    From Social Data: Biases, Methodological Pitfalls, and Ethical Boundaries (2019) · cites this paper as Oktay et al., 2010

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Oktay, H., Taylor, B. J., & Jensen, D. D.
Affiliations
University of Massachusetts Amherst (US)
Venue
Proceedings of the First Workshop on Social Media Analytics
Publisher
ACM
Published
2010-07-25
Pages
1-9
OpenAlex
W1965032599
Cited by
71
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 12 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 7 · 2012: 5
FWCI
13.05
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
closed
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Statistics and Probability › Advanced Causal Inference Techniques
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Bayesian Modeling and Causal Inference
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Simulation Techniques and Applications
Keywords
causal discovery, quasi-experimental design, observational data, online experiments, causal inference, threats to validity, social media management

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review