The DOI matches its Crossref record.
On mouse dynamics as a behavioral biometric for authentication
Abstract
The idea of using one's behavior with a pointing device, such as a mouse or a touchpad, as a behavioral biometric for authentication purposes has gained increasing attention over the past decade. A number of interesting approaches based on the idea have emerged in the literature and promising experimental results have been reported; however, we argue that limitations in the past experimental evaluations of these approaches raise questions about their true effectiveness in a practical setting. In this paper, we review existing authentication approaches based on mouse dynamics and shed light on some important limitations regarding how the effectiveness of these approaches has been evaluated in the past. We present the results of several experiments that we conducted to illustrate our observations and suggest guidelines for evaluating future authentication approaches based on mouse dynamics. We also discuss a number of avenues for additional research that we believe are necessary to advance the state of the art in this area.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Frank, M., Biedert, R., Ma, E., Martinovic, I., & Song, D. (2013) · IEEE Transactions on Information Forensics and Security · doi:10.1109/tifs.2012.2225048 · Cited by 844
Multi-Factor Authentication: A Survey
Ometov, A., Bezzateev, S., Mäkitalo, N., Andreev, S., Mikkonen, T., & Koucheryavy, Y. (2018) · Cryptography · doi:10.3390/cryptography2010001 · Cited by 434
Killing the Password and Preserving Privacy With Device-Centric and Attribute-Based Authentication
Papadamou, K., Gevers, S., Xenakis, C., Sirivianos, M., Zannettou, S., Chifor, B., Teican, S., Gugulea, G., Caponi, A., Recupero, A., et al. (2020) · IEEE Transactions on Information Forensics and Security · doi:10.1109/tifs.2019.2958763 · Cited by 23
Analysing mouse activity for cognitive load detection
Arshad, S., Wang, Y., & Chen, F. (2013) · Proceedings of the 25th Australian Computer-Human Interaction Conference: Augmentation, Application, Innovation, Collaboration · doi:10.1145/2541016.2541083 · Cited by 18
Attacking mouse dynamics authentication using novel Wasserstein conditional DCGAN
Roy, A., Wong, K., & Phan, R. C.-W. (2023) · IEEE Transactions on Information Forensics and Security · doi:10.1109/tifs.2023.3245418 · Cited by 16
Metadata
- Authors
- Jorgensen, Z., & Yu, T.
- Venue
- Proceedings of the 6th ACM Symposium on Information, Computer and Communications Security
- Publisher
- ACM
- Published
- 2011-03-22
- Pages
- 476-482
- OpenAlex
- W1971565662
- Cited by
- 169
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 10.58
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: On mouse dynamics as a behavioral biometric for authentication. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1145/1966913.1966983
- The paper
- Jorgensen, Z., & Yu, T. (2011). On mouse dynamics as a behavioral biometric for authentication. Proceedings of the 6th ACM Symposium on Information, Computer and Communications Security. https://doi.org/10.1145/1966913.1966983
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.