Cited by 24

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Ranking related news predictions

Kanhabua, Nattiya, Blanco, Roi, Matthews, Michael·2011·Proceedings of the 34th international ACM SIGIR conference on Research and development in Information Retrieval

Abstract

We estimate that nearly one third of news articles contain references to future events. While this information can prove crucial to understanding news stories and how events will develop for a given topic, there is currently no easy way to access this information. We propose a new task to address the problem of retrieving and ranking sentences that contain mentions to future events, which we call ranking related news predictions. In this paper, we formally define this task and propose a learning to rank approach based on 4 classes of features: term similarity, entity-based similarity, topic similarity, and temporal similarity. Through extensive evaluations using a corpus consisting of 1.8 millions news articles and 6,000 manually judged relevance pairs, we show that our approach is able to retrieve a significant number of relevant predictions related to a given topic.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1145/2009916.2010018

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Kanhabua et al. 2011 proposed a ranking model for future predictions using a learning-to-rank algorithm.

    “[Kanhabua et al. 2011] also proposed a ranking model for future predictions using a learning-to-rank algorithm”

    From Survey of Temporal Information Retrieval and Related Applications (2015) · cites this paper as Kanhabua et al. 2011

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 36

  1. 10.1145/1328964.1328968 · DOI
  2. A. Asuncion , M. Welling , P. Smyth , and Y. W. Teh . On smoothing and inference for topic models . In Proceedings of UAI'2009 , 2009 . A. Asuncion, M. Welling, P. Smyth, and Y. W. Teh. On smoothing and inference for topic models. In Proceedings of UAI'2009, 2009.
  3. R. Baeza-Yates . Searching the future . In Proceedings of ACM SIGIR workshop MF/IR 2005 , 2005 . R. Baeza-Yates. Searching the future. In Proceedings of ACM SIGIR workshop MF/IR 2005, 2005.
  4. 10.1016/j.ipm.2008.06.003 · DOI
  5. 10.1007/978-3-642-12275-0_5 · DOI · Paper page
  6. 10.1145/1835449.1835507 · DOI
  7. 10.5555/944919.944937 · DOI
  8. J. Canton . The Extreme Future: The Top Trends That Will Reshape the World in the Next 20 Years . Plume , 2007 . J. Canton. The Extreme Future: The Top Trends That Will Reshape the World in the Next 20 Years. Plume, 2007.
  9. 10.5555/1248547.1248566 · DOI
  10. 10.1007/978-3-642-03761-0_25 · DOI
  11. 10.1145/1008992.1008998 · DOI
  12. 10.1073/pnas.0307752101 · DOI · Paper page
  13. 10.1145/1555400.1555420 · DOI · Paper page
  14. 10.1145/775047.775067 · DOI
  15. 10.1016/j.ipm.2004.01.002 · DOI
  16. 10.5555/1887759.1887796 · DOI
  17. 10.1145/1835449.1835486 · DOI
  18. 10.1145/956863.956951 · DOI · Paper page
  19. 10.1145/1183614.1183652 · DOI
  20. 10.1561/1500000016 · DOI
  21. 10.1093/comjnl/bxm112 · DOI
  22. M. Matthews , P. Tolchinsky , R. Blanco , J. Atserias , P. Mika , and H. Zaragoza . Searching through time in the new york times . In Bridging Human-Computer Interaction and Information Retrieval , 2010 . M. Matthews, P. Tolchinsky, R. Blanco, J. Atserias, P. Mika, and H. Zaragoza. Searching through time in the new york times. In Bridging Human-Computer Interaction and Information Retrieval, 2010.
  23. 10.1145/1571941.1572085 · DOI · Paper page
  24. V. Murdock . Exploring Sentence Retrieval . VDM Verlag Dr . Mueller e.K., 2008 . V. Murdock. Exploring Sentence Retrieval. VDM Verlag Dr. Mueller e.K., 2008.
  25. M. J. Pazzani and D. Billsus . The adaptive web . pages 325 -- 341 , 2007 . M. J. Pazzani and D. Billsus. The adaptive web. pages 325--341, 2007. · DOI · Paper page
  26. 10.5555/188490.188561 · DOI
  27. 10.1145/1462198.1462204 · DOI
  28. 10.1145/1273496.1273598 · DOI
  29. 10.1145/1645953.1646223 · DOI
  30. M. Surdeanu , M. Ciaramita , and H. Zaragoza . Learning to rank answers on large online qa collections . In Proceedings of ACL-08: HLT , 2008 . M. Surdeanu, M. Ciaramita, and H. Zaragoza. Learning to rank answers on large online qa collections. In Proceedings of ACL-08: HLT, 2008.
  31. 10.1145/1150402.1150450 · DOI
  32. 10.1145/1148170.1148204 · DOI
  33. 10.1007/s11704-009-0029-z · DOI
  34. 10.1145/1277741.1277790 · DOI
  35. 10.1145/1321440.1321599 · DOI
  36. 10.1145/1015330.1015332 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Kanhabua, N., Blanco, R., & Matthews, M.
Affiliations
  • Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Trondheim, Norway
  • Yahoo! Research, Barcelona, Spain
Venue
Proceedings of the 34th international ACM SIGIR conference on Research and development in Information Retrieval
Publisher
ACM
Published
2011-07-24
Pages
755-764
Cited by
24
References
0

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review