Universal Design: Implications for Computing Education
Abstract
Universal design (UD), a concept that grew from the field of architecture, has recently emerged as a paradigm for designing instructional methods, curriculum, and assessments that are welcoming and accessible to students with a wide range of characteristics, including those related to race, ethnicity, native language, gender, age, and disability. This proactive approach holds promise for more fully including underrepresented groups in computing studies and for decreasing the need, and thus costs, for academic accommodations for students with disabilities. This article summarizes the history and development of UD, references research and practices that support the UD approach, provides examples of the strategies that apply UD to instruction and assessment, and recommends topics for future research. Although the application of UD to teaching and learning is in its infancy, the potential of UD to improve computing instruction should not be ignored. Further research could test the efficacy of specific UD practices in promoting learning in computing fields.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Some papers in our corpus employed UD and UDL to create inclusive educational experiences for the general student population.
“some employed UD [15] and UDL [28] (frameworks with origins in disability activism in response to access barriers) to create inclusive educational experiences for the general student population.”
From Where are the Disabled Students?: A Literature Review of Disability Inclusion in Computing Education Research (2026) · cites this paper as [15]
UD has disability-centered origins.
“even though UD has disability-centered origins [15].”
From Where are the Disabled Students?: A Literature Review of Disability Inclusion in Computing Education Research (2026) · cites this paper as [15]
UD and UDL are frameworks with origins in disability activism in response to access barriers.
“some employed UD [15] and UDL [28] (frameworks with origins in disability activism in response to access barriers)”
From Where are the Disabled Students?: A Literature Review of Disability Inclusion in Computing Education Research (2026) · cites this paper as [15]
Students with disabilities face substantial barriers when diagrams and symbolic content lack adequate textual representations or clear organization.
“Universal design principles and studies on inclusive educational practices [4] consistently show that students with disabilities face substantial barriers when diagrams and symbolic content lack adequate textual representations or clear organization.”
From Human vs LLM-Generated Alt Text for STEM Image Accessibility: A Comparative Study (2026) · cites this paper as [4]
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Accessibility in Software Practice: A Practitioner’s Perspective
Bi, T., Xia, X., Lo, D., Grundy, J., Zimmermann, T., & Ford, D. (2022) · ACM Transactions on Software Engineering and Methodology · doi:10.1145/3503508 · Cited by 109 · see citing works
Mavrou, K., Theodorou, E., Mouka, M., & Liasidou, A. (2025) · Teaching in Higher Education · doi:10.1080/13562517.2025.2507244 · Cited by 7 · see citing works
Figueira, I., Cisneros, J. M., Weber, J. L., Sanka, W., Phan, K., Wong-Ma, J., & Branham, S. M. (2026) · Proceedings of the 57th ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education V.1 · doi:10.1145/3770762.3772561 · Cited by 3 · see citing works
Human vs LLM-Generated Alt Text for STEM Image Accessibility: A Comparative Study
Cardia, M., Angileri, L., Poggianti, C., & Leporini, B. (2026) · Proceedings of the 23rd International Web for All Conference · doi:10.1145/3800424.3800457 · Cited by 2 · see citing works
- Authors
- Burgstahler, S.
- Affiliations
- University of Washington (US)
- Corresponding author
- Burgstahler, Sheryl
- ORCID
- Burgstahler, Sheryl
- Venue
- ACM Transactions on Computing Education
- Published
- 2011-10
- Volume
- 11
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 1-17
- ISSN
- 1946-6226 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1995195858
- Cited by
- 68
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 10 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 3 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 3 · 2012: 3
- FWCI
- 4.61
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- ACM Transactions on Computing Education (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- Division of Human Resource Development (CNS-0837508CNS-1042260HRD-0833504HRD-0929006)
- Division of Computer and Network Systems (CNS-0837508CNS-1042260HRD-0833504HRD-0929006)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Safety Research › Disability Education and Employment
- Social Sciences › Human Factors and Ergonomics › Digital Accessibility for Disabilities
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Science Applications › Teaching and Learning Programming
- Keywords
- Universal Design for Learning, accessibility, students with disabilities, academic accommodations, underrepresented groups, instructional design, assessment design, diversity in computing
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review