Cited by 68Disability Education and EmploymentDigital Accessibility for DisabilitiesTeaching and Learning Programming

Universal Design: Implications for Computing Education

Burgstahler, Sheryl·2011·ACM Transactions on Computing Education

Abstract

Universal design (UD), a concept that grew from the field of architecture, has recently emerged as a paradigm for designing instructional methods, curriculum, and assessments that are welcoming and accessible to students with a wide range of characteristics, including those related to race, ethnicity, native language, gender, age, and disability. This proactive approach holds promise for more fully including underrepresented groups in computing studies and for decreasing the need, and thus costs, for academic accommodations for students with disabilities. This article summarizes the history and development of UD, references research and practices that support the UD approach, provides examples of the strategies that apply UD to instruction and assessment, and recommends topics for future research. Although the application of UD to teaching and learning is in its infancy, the potential of UD to improve computing instruction should not be ignored. Further research could test the efficacy of specific UD practices in promoting learning in computing fields.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1145/2037276.2037283

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Burgstahler, S.
Affiliations
University of Washington (US)
Corresponding author
Burgstahler, Sheryl
Venue
ACM Transactions on Computing Education
Published
2011-10
Volume
11
Issue
3
Pages
1-17
ISSN
1946-6226 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1995195858
Cited by
68
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 10 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 3 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 3 · 2012: 3
FWCI
4.61
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
ACM Transactions on Computing Education (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Division of Human Resource Development (CNS-0837508CNS-1042260HRD-0833504HRD-0929006)
  • Division of Computer and Network Systems (CNS-0837508CNS-1042260HRD-0833504HRD-0929006)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Safety Research › Disability Education and Employment
  • Social Sciences › Human Factors and Ergonomics › Digital Accessibility for Disabilities
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Science Applications › Teaching and Learning Programming
Keywords
Universal Design for Learning, accessibility, students with disabilities, academic accommodations, underrepresented groups, instructional design, assessment design, diversity in computing

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review