Cited by 18Generative Adversarial Networks and Image SynthesisAdvanced Image Processing TechniquesImage Retrieval and Classification Techniques

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Interactive Manga retargeting

Matsui, Yusuke, Yamasaki, Toshihiko, Aizawa, Kiyoharu·2011·ACM SIGGRAPH 2011 Posters

Abstract

The existing content aware image retargeting methods are mainly suitable for natural images, and do not perform well on line drawings. Such methods tend to regard homogeneous areas as less important. For line drawings, this is not always true.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1145/2037715.2037756

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. 10.1145/1399504.1360615 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Matsui, Y., Yamasaki, T., & Aizawa, K.
Affiliations
The University of Tokyo (JP)
Venue
ACM SIGGRAPH 2011 Posters
Publisher
ACM
Published
2011-08-07
Pages
1-1
OpenAlex
W2063166622
Cited by
18
References
0
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 1 · 2019: 2 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 3
FWCI
1.19
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
ACM SIGGRAPH Posters (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Generative Adversarial Networks and Image Synthesis
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Advanced Image Processing Techniques
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Image Retrieval and Classification Techniques
Keywords
content-aware image retargeting, line drawing, manga, cartoons, image compression

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review