The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Second workshop on information heterogeneity and fusion in recommender systems (HetRec2011)
Open accessAbstract
This is the author's version of the work. It is posted here for your personal use. Not for redistribution. The definitive Version of Record was published in RecSys '11 Proceedings of the fifth ACM conference on Recommender systems, http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/2043932.2044016.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The Lastfm dataset contains 1.2K users and 4.6K music items.
“1.2K users on 4.6K music items, and has been specifically utilized by FLOW (Cai et al., 2024) to demonstrate its capabilities in the music domain.”
From A Survey on LLM-powered Agents for Recommender Systems (2025) · cites this paper as Cantador et al., 2011
The Lastfm dataset comprises 73.5K interactions from 1.2K users on 4.6K music items and has been specifically utilized by FLOW to demonstrate its capabilities in the music domain.
“The Lastfm dataset (Cantador et al., 2011), focusing on music recommendation, comprises 73.5K interactions from 1.2K users on 4.6K music items, and has been specifically utilized by FLOW (Cai et al., 2024) to demonstrate its capabilities in the music domain.”
From A Survey on LLM-powered Agents for Recommender Systems (2025) · cites this paper as Cantador et al., 2011
Citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
A Survey on LLM-powered Agents for Recommender Systems
Peng, Q., Liu, H., Huang, H., Yang, J., Yang, Q., & Shao, M. (2025) · Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics: EMNLP 2025 · doi:10.18653/v1/2025.findings-emnlp.620 · Cited by 31
Metadata
- Authors
- Cantador, I., Brusilovsky, P., & Kuflik, T.
- Affiliations
- Universidad Autonoma de Madrid, Madrid, Spain
- University of Pittsburgh (US)
- University of Haifa (IL)
- Venue
- Proceedings of the fifth ACM conference on Recommender systems
- Publisher
- ACM
- Published
- 2011-10-23
- Pages
- 387-388
- OpenAlex
- W4251597219
- Cited by
- 355
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 32 · 2025: 47 · 2024: 32 · 2023: 32 · 2022: 30 · 2021: 29 · 2020: 18 · 2019: 17 · 2018: 17 · 2017: 16 · 2016: 23 · 2015: 18 · 2014: 21 · 2013: 16 · 2012: 7
- FWCI
- 10.57
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- hdl.handle.net
- Locations
- ACM Conference on Recommender Systems (RecSys) (publishedVersion)
- Hispana (publishedVersion)
- Biblos-e Archivo (Universidad Autónoma de Madrid) (acceptedVersion)
- Tesis Doctorals en Xarxa (Consorci de Serveis Universitaris de Catalunya) (acceptedVersion)
- LA Referencia (Red Federada de Repositorios Institucionales de Publicaciones Científicas) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Recommender Systems and Techniques
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Information Retrieval and Search Behavior
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Web Data Mining and Analysis
- Keywords
- information heterogeneity, data fusion, recommender systems, heterogeneous information
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
