The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Time of arrival predictability horizons for public bus routes
Abstract
Automatic vehicle location (AVL) systems such as those installed on public bus services produce a large amount of route specific GPS data. Many cities, Dublin Ireland being among the newest, are using this data to display time of arrival (TOA) predictions on smart screens at every bus stop on their transportation network. This paper analyses the TOA predictability of buses travelling on Dublin Bus's longest and most frequented route 46A. We propose a pattern-based route time prediction system that uses a nearest neighbour approach to combine sub-tracks of historical GPS probe data to produce prediction of time of arrival. We show experimentally that there is an optimal number of neighbours k which changes as a function of the distance travelled. We also show that long term predictions are very uncertain and we make the recommendation that these predictions be conveyed to a user as an upper/lower bound pair. We show that meaningful predictions only emerge when the bus is within 6km from its predicted bus stop.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“This early research show that k-NN can provide predicted results with the mean absolute error less than about 3 minutes when the bus travelled at least around a quarter of its whole journey.”
From BusTime: Which is the Right Prediction Model for My Bus Arrival Time? (2020) · cites this paper as [2]
Citations
Cites
No references could be resolved yet.
Research works printed but not linked: 9
- 10.1109/ITSC.2011.6082962 · doi:10.1109/itsc.2011.6082962
- D. Evans and A. J. Jones . A proof of the gamma test . Proceedings of the Royal Society of London Series A , 458 ( 2027 ):2759+, Nov. 2002 . D. Evans and A. J. Jones. A proof of the gamma test. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London Series A, 458(2027):2759+, Nov. 2002.
- 10.1007/11853565_15 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1016/j.artint.2007.01.006 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1080/15472450.2011.570109 · DOI
- 10.1145/1463434.1463452 · DOI
- 10.1145/1653771.1653833 · doi:10.1145/1653771.1653833
- N. Uno , F. Kurauchi , H. Tamura , and Y. Iida . Using bus probe data for analysis of travel time variability. Journal of Intelligent Transportation Systems: Technology, Planning, and Operations, 13(1):2--15 , 2009 . N. Uno, F. Kurauchi, H. Tamura, and Y. Iida. Using bus probe data for analysis of travel time variability. Journal of Intelligent Transportation Systems: Technology, Planning, and Operations, 13(1):2--15, 2009.
- 10.1109/TITS.2009.2020208 · DOI
Cited by
A predictive-control framework to address bus bunching
Andres, M., & Nair, R. (2017) · Transportation Research Part B: Methodological · doi:10.1016/j.trb.2017.06.013 · Cited by 95
Headway-based bus bunching prediction using transit smart card data
Yu, H., Chen, D., Wu, Z., Ma, X., & Wang, Y. (2016) · Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies · doi:10.1016/j.trc.2016.09.007 · Cited by 80
BusTime: Which is the Right Prediction Model for My Bus Arrival Time?
Liu, D., Sun, J., & Wang, S. (2020) · 2020 5th IEEE International Conference on Big Data Analytics (ICBDA) · doi:10.1109/icbda49040.2020.9101265 · Cited by 11
Metadata
- Authors
- Coffey, C., Pozdnoukhov, A., & Calabrese, F.
- Affiliations
- National University of Ireland Maynooth, Maynooth, Co. Kildare, Ireland
- National University of Ireland Maynooth, Co. Kildare, Ireland
- Smarter Cities Technology Centre, IBM Dublin Research Laboratory, Ireland
- Venue
- Proceedings of the 4th ACM SIGSPATIAL International Workshop on Computational Transportation Science
- Publisher
- ACM
- Published
- 2011-11
- Pages
- 1-5
- Cited by
- 24
- References
- 0
- Funders
- Science Foundation Ireland (07/SRC/I1168)
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Time of arrival predictability horizons for public bus routes. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1145/2068984.2068985
- The paper
- Coffey, C., Pozdnoukhov, A., & Calabrese, F. (2011). Time of arrival predictability horizons for public bus routes. Proceedings of the 4th ACM SIGSPATIAL International Workshop on Computational Transportation Science. https://doi.org/10.1145/2068984.2068985
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.