Mining multimodal sequential patterns: a case study on affect detection
Open accessAbstract
Temporal data from multimodal interaction such as speech and bio-signals cannot be easily analysed without a preprocessing phase through which some key characteristics of the signals are extracted. Typically, standard statistical signal features such as average values are calculated prior to the analysis and, subsequently, are presented either to a multimodal fusion mechanism or a computational model of the interaction. This paper proposes a feature extraction methodology which is based on frequent sequence mining within and across multiple modalities of user input. The proposed method is applied for the fusion of physiological signals and gameplay information in a game survey dataset. The obtained sequences are analysed and used as predictors of user affect resulting in computational models of equal or higher accuracy compared to the models built on standard statistical features.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Context (situation, interacting persons, place etc) can also improve emotion inference.
“Context (situation, interacting persons, place etc) can also improve emotion inference [271], [272].”
From Survey on RGB, 3D, Thermal, and Multimodal Approaches for Facial Expression Recognition: History, Trends, and Affect-Related Applications (2016) · cites this paper as [272]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Corneanu, C. A., Simon, M. O., Cohn, J. F., & Guerrero, S. E. (2016) · IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence · doi:10.1109/tpami.2016.2515606 · Cited by 527 · see citing works
Learning deep physiological models of affect
Martinez, H. P., Bengio, Y., & Yannakakis, G. N. (2013) · IEEE Computational Intelligence Magazine · doi:10.1109/mci.2013.2247823 · Cited by 287 · see citing works
Self-citationMining a multimodal corpus of doctor's training for virtual patient's feedbacks,
Porhet, C., Ochs, M., Saubesty, J., de Montcheuil, G., & Bertrand, R. (2017) · Proceedings of the 19th ACM International Conference on Multimodal Interaction · doi:10.1145/3136755.3136816 · Cited by 10 · see citing works
- Authors
- Martínez, H. P., & Yannakakis, G. N.
- Affiliations
- University of Copenhagen (DK)
- Venue
- Proceedings of the 13th international conference on multimodal interfaces
- Publisher
- ACM
- Published
- 2011-11-14
- Pages
- 3-10
- OpenAlex
- W2041996544
- Cited by
- 42
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2023: 2 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 10 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 2
- FWCI
- 5.59
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- www.um.edu.mt
- Locations
- INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON MULTIMODAL INTERACTION (publishedVersion)
- IT University Of Copenhagen (IT University of Copenhagen) (publishedVersion)
- OAR@UM (University of Malta) (acceptedVersion, other-oa)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Emotion and Mood Recognition
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Data Mining Algorithms and Applications
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Signal Processing › Time Series Analysis and Forecasting
- Keywords
- frequent sequence mining, feature extraction, physiological signals, gameplay data, multimodal fusion
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review