The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Detecting repackaged smartphone applications in third-party android marketplaces
Abstract
Recent years have witnessed incredible popularity and adoption of smartphones and mobile devices, which is accompanied by large amount and wide variety of feature-rich smartphone applications. These smartphone applications (or apps), typically organized in different application marketplaces, can be conveniently browsed by mobile users and then simply clicked to install on a variety of mobile devices. In practice, besides the official marketplaces from platform vendors (e.g., Google and Apple), a number of third-party alternative marketplaces have also been created to host thousands of apps (e.g., to meet regional or localization needs). To maintain and foster a hygienic smartphone app ecosystem, there is a need for each third-party marketplace to offer quality apps to mobile users.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Schleimer, S., S, W. D., & Aiken, A. (2003) · Proceedings of the 2003 ACM SIGMOD International Conference on Management of Data · doi:10.1145/872757.872770 · Cited by 1,099
Cited by
What the App is That? Deception and Countermeasures in the Android User Interface
Bianchi, A., Corbetta, J., Invernizzi, L., Fratantonio, Y., Kruegel, C., & Vigna, G. (2015) · 2015 IEEE Symposium on Security and Privacy · doi:10.1109/sp.2015.62 · Cited by 147
Luo, L., Ming, J., Wu, D., Liu, P., & Zhu, S. (2017) · IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering · doi:10.1109/tse.2017.2655046 · Cited by 144
Conceptual framework for the security of mobile health applications on Android platform
Hussain, M., Zaidan, A. A., Zidan, B. B., Iqbal, S., Ahmed, M. M., Albahri, O. S., & Albahri, A. S. (2018) · Telematics and Informatics · doi:10.1016/j.tele.2018.03.005 · Cited by 122
Program Logic Based Software Plagiarism Detection
Zhang, F., Wu, D., Liu, P., & Zhu, S. (2014) · 2014 IEEE 25th International Symposium on Software Reliability Engineering · doi:10.1109/issre.2014.18 · Cited by 57
Program Characterization Using Runtime Values and Its Application to Software Plagiarism Detection
Jhi, Y.-C., Jia, X., Wang, X., Zhu, S., Liu, P., & Wu, D. (2015) · IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering · doi:10.1109/tse.2015.2418777 · Cited by 35
Metadata
- Authors
- Zhou, W., Zhou, Y., Jiang, X., & Ning, P.
- Venue
- Proceedings of the second ACM conference on Data and Application Security and Privacy
- Publisher
- ACM
- Published
- 2012-02-07
- Pages
- 317-326
- OpenAlex
- W1971497680
- Cited by
- 590
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 59.53
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
