Cited by 78Information Systems Theories and ImplementationICT in Developing CommunitiesGlobal and Cross-Cultural Management

Cultural appropriation: information technologies as sites of transnational imagination

Lindtner, Silvia, Anderson, Ken, Dourish, Paul·2012·Proceedings of the ACM 2012 conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work

Abstract

The diverse ways in which technologies are modified and appropriated into local contexts are an important theme in CSCW research. Today, translocal processes such as the formation of international corporations and the movement of people and ideas across nation states increasingly shape these local contexts of technology use and design. We draw from prior work on appropriation in CSCW and meld it with work from transnational studies to illustrate appropriation as a cultural phenomenon and as it unfolds in relation to emerging translocal processes. We ground our explorations in findings from ethnographic research on collaborations and exchange among IT professionals in urban China. This work makes two main contributions. First, it expands CSCW's focus on socio-technical systems by taking seriously socio-political and socio-economic processes. Second, it contributes to debates on cross-cultural and global technological development by employing transnational imagination as an analytical tool.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1145/2145204.2145220

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Appropriation is a social and cultural process, where users imbue technologies with meaning and significance based on their specific cultural contexts.

    “These forms of appropriation are not just about customization but are a social and cultural process, where users imbue technologies with meaning and significance based on their specific cultural contexts [70].”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Lindtner, S., Anderson, K., & Dourish, P.
Affiliations
  • University of California, Irvine (US)
  • Intel (United States) (US)
Venue
Proceedings of the ACM 2012 conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work
Publisher
ACM
Published
2012-02-11
Pages
77-86
OpenAlex
W2020605585
Cited by
78
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 16 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 1
FWCI
10.78
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW) (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Information Systems Theories and Implementation
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › ICT in Developing Communities
  • Social Sciences › Anthropology › Global and Cross-Cultural Management
Keywords
cultural appropriation, technology appropriation, transnational research, socio-technical systems, IT professionals, urban China, socio-political processes

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review