The DOI matches its Crossref record; 41 of the 44 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
To stay or leave?: the relationship of emotional and informational support to commitment in online health support groups
Abstract
Today many people with serious diseases use online support groups to seek social support. For these groups to be sustained and effective, member retention and commitment is important. Our study examined how different types and amounts of social support in an online cancer support group are associated with participants' length of membership. We first built machine learning models to automatically identify the extent to which messages contained emotional and informational support. Agreement with human judges was high (r > 0.76). We then used these models to measure the support exchanged in 1.5 million messages. Finally, we applied quantitative event history analysis to assess how exposure to emotional and informational support predicted group members' length of subsequent participation. The results demonstrated that the more emotional support members were exposed to, the lower the risk of dropout. In contrast, informational support did not have the same strong effects on commitment. We speculate that emotional support enhanced members' relationships with one another or the group as a whole, whereas informational support satisfied members' short-term information needs.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“These two forms of support have been found to be most prevalent and effective in several studies of online support and social media [38,62,66,67].”
From Psychosocial Effects of the COVID-19 Pandemic: Large-scale Quasi-Experimental Study on Social Media (2020) · cites this paper as [67]
In the citing paper
“Social media enables individuals to self-disclose and express their emotional and informational needs [67].”
From Psychosocial Effects of the COVID-19 Pandemic: Large-scale Quasi-Experimental Study on Social Media (2020) · cites this paper as [67]
Citations
Cites
(2003) · Journal of Machine Learning Research · doi:10.5555/944919.944937 · Cited by 32,337
Data Mining: Practical Machine Learning Tools and Techniques
Witten, I. H., Frank, E., & Hall, M. A. (2011) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/c2009-0-19715-5 · Cited by 25,543
Applied Longitudinal Data Analysis: Modeling Change and Event Occurrence
Singer, J. D., & Willett, J. B. (2003) · doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195152968.001.0001 · Cited by 10,647
Witten, I. H. (2008) · Cited by 9,143
Recognizing contextual polarity in phrase-level sentiment analysis
Wilson, T., Wiebe, J., & Hoffmann, P. (2005) · doi:10.3115/1220575.1220619 · Cited by 3,388
Cheap and fast---but is it good?: evaluating non-expert annotations for natural language tasks
Snow, R., O'Connor, B., Jurafsky, D., & Ng, A. Y. (2008) · Proceedings of the Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing - EMNLP '08 · doi:10.3115/1613715.1613751 · Cited by 1,887
Eysenbach, G., Powell, J., Englesakis, M., Rizo, C., & Stern, A. (2004) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.328.7449.1166 · Cited by 1,268
Social media use in the United States: implications for health communication
Chou, W.-Y. S., Hunt, Y. M., Beckjord, E. B., Moser, R. P., & Hesse, B. W. (2009) · Journal of Medical Internet Research · doi:10.2196/jmir.1249 · Cited by 1,082
SOCIALIZATION TACTICS: LONGITUDINAL EFFECTS ON NEWCOMER ADJUSTMENT.
Ashforth, B. K., & Saks, A. M. (1996) · Academy of Management Journal · doi:10.2307/256634 · Cited by 995
Enriching the knowledge sources used in a maximum entropy part-of-speech tagger
Toutanova, K., & Manning, C. D. (2000) · Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (EMNLP) · doi:10.3115/1117794.1117802 · Cited by 965
Cited by
Sorted by citations
A deep learning model for detecting mental illness from user content on social media
Kim, J., Lee, J., Park, E., & Han, J. (2020) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-020-68764-y · Cited by 325
Social Barriers Faced by Newcomers Placing Their First Contribution in Open Source Software Projects
Steinmacher, I., Conte, T. U., Gerosa, M. A., & Redmiles, D. (2015) · ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW) · doi:10.1145/2675133.2675215 · Cited by 305
Sentiment Analysis in MOOC Discussion Forums: What does it tell us?
Wen, M., Yang, D., & Rosé, C. P. (2014) · Cited by 285
Six ‘biases’ against patients and carers in evidence-based medicine
Greenhalgh, T., Snow, R., Ryan, S., Rees, S., & Salisbury, H. (2015) · BMC Medicine · doi:10.1186/s12916-015-0437-x · Cited by 283
A systematic literature review on the barriers faced by newcomers to open source software projects
Steinmacher, I., Silva, M. A. G., Gerosa, M. A., & Redmiles, D. (2014) · Information and Software Technology · doi:10.1016/j.infsof.2014.11.001 · Cited by 239
Metadata
- Authors
- Wang, Y.-C., Kraut, R., & Levine, J. M.
- Affiliations
- Carnegie Mellon University (US)
- University of Pittsburgh (US)
- Venue
- Proceedings of the ACM 2012 conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work
- Publisher
- ACM
- Published
- 2012-02-11
- Pages
- 833-842
- OpenAlex
- W2106212012
- Cited by
- 282
- References
- 44
- Citations by year
- 2026: 12 · 2025: 15 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 18 · 2022: 24 · 2021: 25 · 2020: 28 · 2019: 23 · 2018: 24 · 2017: 31 · 2016: 16 · 2015: 24 · 2014: 22 · 2013: 6 · 2012: 5
- FWCI
- 97.15
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW) (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- National Science Foundation
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Health Literacy and Information Accessibility
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Mental Health via Writing
- Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Information Systems and Management › Knowledge Management and Sharing
- Keywords
- online support groups, cancer support groups, member retention, dropout, emotional support, information support, social support, message analysis, machine learning classification, event history analysis, serious illness, online communities
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
