The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
A signal processing approach to fair surface design
Abstract
In this paper we describe a new tool for interactive free-form fair surface design. By generalizing classical discrete Fourier analysis to two-dimensional discrete surface signals -- functions defined on polyhedral surfaces of arbitrary topology --, we reduce the problem of surface smoothing, or fairing, to low-pass filtering. We describe a very simple surface signal low-pass filter algorithm that applies to surfaces of arbitrary topology. As opposed to other existing optimization-based fairing methods, which are computationally more expensive, this is a linear time and space complexity algorithm. With this algorithm, fairing very large surfaces, such as those obtained from volumetric medical data, becomes affordable. By combining this algorithm with surface subdivision methods we obtain a very effective fair surface design technique. We then extend the analysis, and modify the algorithm accordingly, to accommodate different types of constraints. Some constraints can be imposed without any modification of the algorithm, while others require the solution of a small associated linear system of equations. In particular, vertex location constraints, vertex normal constraints, and surface normal discontinuities across curves embedded in the surface, can be imposed with this technique. CR Categories and Subject Descriptors: I.3.3 [Computer Graphics]: Picture/image generation - display algorithms; I.3.5 [Computer Graphics]: Computational Geometry and Object Modeling - curve, surface, solid, and object representations;J.6[Com- puter Applications]: Computer-Aided Engineering - computeraided design General Terms: Algorithms, Graphics. 1
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Golub, G. (2012) · doi:10.56021/9781421407944 · Cited by 34,505
Cited by
A volumetric method for building complex models from range images
Curless, B., & Levoy, M. (1996) · Proceedings of the 23rd annual conference on Computer graphics and interactive techniques · doi:10.1145/237170.237269 · Cited by 3,124
Deeper Insights Into Graph Convolutional Networks for Semi-Supervised Learning
Li, Q., Han, Z., & Wu, X.-M. (2018) · Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.1609/aaai.v32i1.11604 · Cited by 2,872
Graph convolutional networks: a comprehensive review
Zhang, S., Tong, H., Xu, J., & Maciejewski, R. (2019) · Computational Social Networks · doi:10.1186/s40649-019-0069-y · Cited by 1,888
Implicit fairing of irregular meshes using diffusion and curvature flow
Desbrun, M., Meyer, M., Schröder, P., & Barr, A. H. (1999) · Proceedings of the 26th annual conference on Computer graphics and interactive techniques - SIGGRAPH '99 · doi:10.1145/311535.311576 · Cited by 1,538
Robust moving least-squares fitting with sharp features
Fleishman, S., Cohen-Or, D., & Silva, C. T. (2005) · ACM Transactions on Graphics · doi:10.1145/1073204.1073227 · Cited by 580
Metadata
- Authors
- Taubin, G.
- Venue
- Proceedings of the 22nd annual conference on Computer graphics and interactive techniques - SIGGRAPH '95
- Publisher
- ACM Press
- Published
- 1995
- Pages
- 351-358
- OpenAlex
- W2079017595
- Cited by
- 1,855
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 5.30
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A signal processing approach to fair surface design. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1145/218380.218473
- The paper
- Taubin, G. (1995). A signal processing approach to fair surface design. Proceedings of the 22nd annual conference on Computer graphics and interactive techniques - SIGGRAPH '95. https://doi.org/10.1145/218380.218473
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.