The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
We know what @you #tag: does the dual role affect hashtag adoption?
Abstract
Researchers and social observers have both believed that hashtags, as a new type of organizational objects of information, play a dual role in online microblogging communities (e.g., Twitter). On one hand, a hashtag serves as a bookmark of content, which links tweets with similar topics; on the other hand, a hashtag serves as the symbol of a community membership, which bridges a virtual community of users. Are the real users aware of this dual role of hashtags? Is the dual role affecting their behavior of adopting a hashtag? Is hashtag adoption predictable? We take the initiative to investigate and quantify the effects of the dual role on hashtag adoption. We propose comprehensive measures to quantify the major factors of how a user selects content tags as well as joins communities. Experiments using large scale Twitter datasets prove the effectiveness of the dual role, where both the content measures and the community measures significantly correlate to hashtag adoption on Twitter. With these measures as features, a machine learning model can effectively predict the future adoption of hashtags that a user has never used before.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Measuring user influence in twitter: The million follower fallacy
Cha, M., Haddadi, H., Benevenuto, F., & Gummadi, K. (2010) · Proceedings of the International AAAI Conference on Web and Social Media · doi:10.1609/icwsm.v4i1.14033 · Cited by 3,022 · cited 3×
“Indeed, it has been proved in literature that while the number of followers sheerly represents a user’s popularity, the following relationship reveals little about the social influence of a user [4].”
BackgroundInfluential
Cited by
Is the Sample Good Enough? Comparing Data from Twitter's Streaming API with Twitter's Firehose
Morstatter, F., Pfeffer, J., Liu, H., & Carley, K. (2021) · Proceedings of the International AAAI Conference on Web and Social Media · doi:10.1609/icwsm.v7i1.14401 · Cited by 863
Competition among memes in a world with limited attention
Weng, L., Flammini, A., Vespignani, A., & Menczer, F. (2012) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/srep00335 · Cited by 620
Searchable talk: the linguistic functions of hashtags
Zappavigna, M. (2015) · Social Semiotics · doi:10.1080/10350330.2014.996948 · Cited by 483
Improving LDA topic models for microblogs via tweet pooling and automatic labeling
Mehrotra, R., Sanner, S., Buntine, W., & Xie, L. (2013) · Proceedings of the 36th international ACM SIGIR conference on Research and development in information retrieval · doi:10.1145/2484028.2484166 · Cited by 461
Social Media data: Challenges, opportunities and limitations in urban studies
Martí, P., Serrano-Estrada, L., & Nolasco-Cirugeda, A. (2019) · Computers, Environment and Urban Systems · doi:10.1016/j.compenvurbsys.2018.11.001 · Cited by 325
Metadata
- Authors
- Yang, L., Sun, T., Zhang, M., & Mei, Q.
- Venue
- Proceedings of the 21st international conference on World Wide Web
- Publisher
- ACM
- Published
- 2012-04-16
- Pages
- 261-270
- OpenAlex
- W2104894372
- Cited by
- 211
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 21.78
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: We know what @you #tag: does the dual role affect hashtag adoption? https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1145/2187836.2187872
- The paper
- Yang, L., Sun, T., Zhang, M., & Mei, Q. (2012). We know what @you #tag: does the dual role affect hashtag adoption? Proceedings of the 21st international conference on World Wide Web. https://doi.org/10.1145/2187836.2187872
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.