The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
A predictive model for the temporal dynamics of information diffusion in online social networks
Open accessAbstract
Today, online social networks have become powerful tools for the spread of information. They facilitate the rapid and large-scale propagation of content and the consequences of an information -- whether it is favorable or not to someone, false or true -- can then take considerable proportions. Therefore it is essential to provide means to analyze the phenomenon of information dissemination in such networks. Many recent studies have addressed the modeling of the process of information diffusion, from a topological point of view and in a theoretical perspective, but we still know little about the factors involved in it. With the assumption that the dynamics of the spreading process at the macroscopic level is explained by interactions at microscopic level between pairs of users and the topology of their interconnections, we propose a practical solution which aims to predict the temporal dynamics of diffusion in social networks. Our approach is based on machine learning techniques and the inference of time-dependent diffusion probabilities from a multidimensional analysis of individual behaviors. Experimental results on a real dataset extracted from Twitter show the interest and effectiveness of the proposed approach as well as interesting recommendations for future investigation.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
What is Twitter, a social network or a news media?
Kwak, H., Lee, C., Park, H., & Moon, S. (2010) · Proceedings of the 19th international conference on World wide web · doi:10.1145/1772690.1772751 · Cited by 6,652
Everyone's an influencer: quantifying influence on twitter
Bakshy, E., Hofman, J. M., Mason, W. A., & Watts, D. J. (2011) · Proceedings of the fourth ACM international conference on Web search and data mining · doi:10.1145/1935826.1935845 · Cited by 1,689
Cited by
Information diffusion in online social networks: a survey
Guille, A., Hacid, H., Favre, C., & Zighed, D. A. (2013) · ACM SIGMOD Record · doi:10.1145/2503792.2503797 · Cited by 851
Self-citationDynamics of information diffusion and its applications on complex networks
Zhang, Z.-K., Liu, C., Zhan, X.-X., Lu, X., Zhang, C.-X., & Zhang, Y.-C. (2016) · Physics Reports · doi:10.1016/j.physrep.2016.07.002 · Cited by 484
A Survey of Information Cascade Analysis: Models, Predictions, and Recent Advances
Zhou, F., Xu, X., Trajcevski, G., & Zhang, K. (2022) · ACM Computing Surveys · doi:10.1145/3433000 · Cited by 259
Digital Wildfires: Propagation, Verification, Regulation, and Responsible Innovation
Webb, H., Burnap, P., Procter, R., Rana, O., Stahl, B. C., Williams, M., Housley, W., Edwards, A., & Jirotka, M. (2016) · ACM Transactions on Information Systems · doi:10.1145/2893478 · Cited by 64
Metadata
- Authors
- Guille, A., & Hacid, H.
- Venue
- Proceedings of the 21st International Conference on World Wide Web
- Publisher
- ACM
- Published
- 2012-04-16
- Pages
- 1145-1152
- OpenAlex
- W2032342806
- Cited by
- 192
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 12.29
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A predictive model for the temporal dynamics of information diffusion in online social networks. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1145/2187980.2188254
- The paper
- Guille, A., & Hacid, H. (2012). A predictive model for the temporal dynamics of information diffusion in online social networks. Proceedings of the 21st International Conference on World Wide Web. https://doi.org/10.1145/2187980.2188254
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.