The DOI matches its Crossref record; 42 of the 43 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Personalized input: improving ten-finger touchscreen typing through automatic adaptation
Abstract
Although typing on touchscreens is slower than typing on physical keyboards, touchscreens offer a critical potential advantage: they are software-based, and, as such, the keyboard layout and classification models used to interpret key presses can dynamically adapt to suit each user's typing pattern. To explore this potential, we introduce and evaluate two novel personalized keyboard interfaces, both of which adapt their underlying key-press classification models. The first keyboard also visually adapts the location of keys while the second one always maintains a visually stable rectangular layout. A three-session user evaluation showed that the keyboard with the stable rectangular layout significantly improved typing speed compared to a control condition with no personalization. Although no similar benefit was found for the keyboard that also offered visual adaptation, overall subjective response to both new touchscreen keyboards was positive. As personalized keyboards are still an emerging area of research, we also outline a design space that includes dimensions of adaptation and key-press classification features.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“We join Bennett, Das, and collaborators in suggesting that advocacy is integral to creating access by shining the light on the understated work done by people with disabilities to create and facilitate access [6,15].”
From Advocacy as Access Work: How People with Visual Impairments Gain Access to Digital Banking in India (2023) · cites this paper as [15]
In the citing paper
“Thus, we contribute the novel dimension of demonstrating competence in addition to confirming prior research showing that the work of self-advocacy involves creating awareness [15,60], escalation [3,37], and gathering support [3,37].”
From Advocacy as Access Work: How People with Visual Impairments Gain Access to Digital Banking in India (2023) · cites this paper as [15]
Citations
Cites
Biometry: The Principles and Practice of Statistics in Biological Research
Sokal, R. R., & Rohlf, F. J. (1969) · Cited by 20,963
Development of NASA-TLX (Task Load Index): Results of Empirical and Theoretical Research
(1988) · Advances in Psychology · doi:10.1016/s0166-4115(08)62386-9 · Cited by 15,003
Wrappers for feature subset selection
Kohavi, R., & John, G. H. (1997) · Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.1016/s0004-3702(97)00043-x · Cited by 9,096
Jacko, J. A., & Sears, A. (2013) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.50-3307 · Cited by 1,360
Hancock, P. A., & Meshkati, N. (1988) · Cited by 954
Phrase sets for evaluating text entry techniques
MacKenzie, I. S., & Soukoreff, R. W. (2003) · CHI '03 extended abstracts on Human factors in computing systems - CHI '03 · doi:10.1145/765891.765971 · Cited by 825
The design and evaluation of a high-performance soft keyboard
MacKenzie, I. S., & Zhang, S. X. (1999) · CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems · doi:10.1145/302979.302983 · Cited by 444
Kristensson, P.-O., & Zhai, S. (2004) · ACM Symposium on User Interface Software and Technology (UIST) · doi:10.1145/1029632.1029640 · Cited by 419
Metrics for text entry research: an evaluation of MSD and KSPC, and a new unified error metric
Soukoreff, R. W., & MacKenzie, I. S. (2003) · Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems · doi:10.1145/642611.642632 · Cited by 398
Steps to take before intelligent user interfaces become real
Höök, K. (2000) · Interacting with Computers · doi:10.1016/s0953-5438(99)00006-5 · Cited by 322
Research works printed but not linked: 2
- 10.5555/1776994.1777055 · DOI
- Langendorf , D. J. : Textware solution's Fitaly keyboard v1.0 easing the burden of keyboard input . WinCELair Review , February 1998 . Langendorf, D. J.: Textware solution's Fitaly keyboard v1.0 easing the burden of keyboard input. WinCELair Review, February 1998.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Performance Envelopes of Virtual Keyboard Text Input Strategies in Virtual Reality
Dudley, J. J., Benko, H., Wigdor, D., & Kristensson, P. O. (2019) · Proceedings - International Symposium on Mixed and Augmented Reality, ISMAR · doi:10.1109/ismar.2019.00027 · Cited by 149
Vertanen, K., Memmi, H., Emge, J., Reyal, S., & Kristensson, P. O. (2015) · CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems · doi:10.1145/2702123.2702135 · Cited by 134
A Cost-Benefit Study of Text Entry Suggestion Interaction
Quinn, P., & Zhai, S. (2016) · CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems · doi:10.1145/2858036.2858305 · Cited by 105
Elderly text-entry performance on touchscreens
Nicolau, H., & Jorge, J. (2012) · Proceedings of the 14th international ACM SIGACCESS conference on Computers and accessibility · doi:10.1145/2384916.2384939 · Cited by 100
Yi, X., Yu, C., Zhang, M., Gao, S., Sun, K., & Shi, Y. (2015) · ACM Symposium on User Interface Software and Technology (UIST) · doi:10.1145/2807442.2807504 · Cited by 106
Metadata
- Authors
- Findlater, L., & Wobbrock, J.
- Affiliations
- University of Washington (US)
- Venue
- Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems
- Publisher
- ACM
- Published
- 2012-05-05
- Pages
- 815-824
- OpenAlex
- W2118711147
- Cited by
- 106
- References
- 43
- Citations by year
- 2026: 4 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 14 · 2014: 11 · 2013: 14 · 2012: 4
- FWCI
- 9.66
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- National Science Foundation
- Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Human-Computer Interaction › Usability and User Interface Design
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Human-Computer Interaction › Interactive and Immersive Displays
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › User Authentication and Security Systems
- Keywords
- touchscreen keyboards, typing speed, user personalization, design space exploration
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
