The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Finding and reminding: file organization from the desktop
Open accessAbstract
This paper summarizes and synthesizes two independent studies of the ways users organize and find files on their computers. The first study (Barreau 1995) investigated information organization practices among users of DOS, Windows and OS/2. The second study (Nardi, Anderson and Erickson 1995), examined the finding and filing practices of Macintosh users. There were more similarities in the two studies than differences. Users in both studies (1) preferred location-based finding because of its crucial reminding function; (2) avoided elaborate filing schemes; (3) archived relatively little information; and (4) worked with three types of information: ephemeral, working and archived. A main difference between the study populations was that the Macintosh users used subdirectories to organize information and the DOS users did not.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
The Appropriation of Interactive Technologies: Some Lessons from Placeless Documents
Dourish, P. (2003) · Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW) · doi:10.1023/a:1026149119426 · Cited by 548
Boardman, R., & Sasse, M. A. (2004) · Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems · doi:10.1145/985692.985766 · Cited by 414
Information archiving with bookmarks: personal Web space construction and organization
Abrams, D., Baecker, R., & Chignell, M. (1998) · Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human factors in computing systems - CHI '98 · doi:10.1145/274644.274651 · Cited by 314
CybreMinder: A Context-Aware System for Supporting Reminders
Dey, A. K., & Abowd, G. D. (2000) · doi:10.5555/647986.757284 · Cited by 291
Investigating familiar interactions to help older adults learn computer applications more easily
Hollinworth, N., & Hwang, F. (2011) · Electronic Workshops in Computing · doi:10.14236/ewic/hci2011.79 · Cited by 35
Metadata
- Authors
- Barreau, D., & Nardi, B. A.
- Venue
- ACM SIGCHI Bulletin
- Published
- 1995-07
- Volume
- 27
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 39-43
- ISSN
- 0736-6906 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2097127516
- Cited by
- 530
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 43.10
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Finding and reminding: file organization from the desktop. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1145/221296.221307
- The paper
- Barreau, D., & Nardi, B. A. (1995). Finding and reminding: file organization from the desktop. ACM SIGCHI Bulletin. https://doi.org/10.1145/221296.221307
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.