Readability of fonts in the windows environment
Abstract
No abstract available.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Tullis et al. (1995) found no difference in reading speed between serif and sans serif fonts.
“A study by Tullis et al., (1995), found no difference in reading speed between serif and san serif fonts, which was in contrast with the finding of a study by Bernard et al., (2001), who found that serif fonts were read faster than san serif fonts.”
From Reading on the Computer Screen: Does Font Type has Effects on Web Text Readability? (2013) · cites this paper as Tullis et al., 1995
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Reading on the Computer Screen: Does Font Type has Effects on Web Text Readability?
Ali, A. Z. M., Wahid, R., Samsudin, K., & Idris, M. Z. (2013) · International Education Studies · doi:10.5539/ies.v6n3p26 · Cited by 69 · see citing works
- Authors
- Tullis, T. S., Boynton, J. L., & Hersh, H.
- Affiliations
- Fidelity Investments (United States) (US)
- Venue
- Conference companion on Human factors in computing systems - CHI '95
- Publisher
- ACM Press
- Published
- 1995
- Pages
- 127-128
- OpenAlex
- W2035850081
- Cited by
- 79
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 2 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 2 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 6
- FWCI
- 1.08
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- CHI Conference Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI EA) (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Human-Computer Interaction › Usability and User Interface Design
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › History and Philosophy of Science › Graphic Design and Typography
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Reading and Literacy Development
- Keywords
- windows, text display, character legibility
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
