The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
An effective hash-based algorithm for mining association rules
Open accessAbstract
In this paper, we examine the issue of mining association rules among items in a large database of sales transactions. The mining of association rules can be mapped into the problem of discovering large itemsets where a large itemset is a group of items which appear in a sufficient number of transactions. The problem of discovering large itemsets can be solved by constructing a candidate set of itemsets first and then, identifying, within this candidate set, those itemsets that meet the large itemset requirement. Generally this is done iteratively for each large k-itemset in increasing order of k where a large k-itemset is a large itemset with k items. To determine large itemsets from a huge number of candidate large itemsets in early iterations is usually the dominating factor for the overall data mining performance. To address this issue, we propose an effective hash-based algorithm for the candidate set generation. Explicitly, the number of candidate 2-itemsets generated by the proposed algorithm is, in orders of magnitude, smaller than that by previous methods, thus resolving the performance bottleneck. Note that the generation of smaller candidate sets enables us to effectively trim the transaction database size at a much earlier stage of the iterations, thereby reducing the computational cost for later iterations significantly. Extensive simulation study is conducted to evaluate performance of the proposed algorithm.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Quinlan, J. R. (1986) · Machine Learning · doi:10.1007/bf00116251 · Cited by 21,439
Mining association rules between sets of items in large databases
Agrawal, R., Imieliński, T., & Swami, A. (1993) · Proceedings of the 1993 ACM SIGMOD international conference on Management of data · doi:10.1145/170035.170072 · Cited by 14,907
Cited by
Data mining: concepts and techniques
(2012) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.49-3305 · Cited by 28,531
Mining frequent patterns without candidate generation
Han, J., Pei, J., & Yin, Y. (2000) · ACM SIGMOD Record · doi:10.1145/335191.335372 · Cited by 6,402
Frequent pattern mining: current status and future directions
Han, J., Cheng, H., Xin, D., & Yan, X. (2007) · Data Mining and Knowledge Discovery · doi:10.1007/s10618-006-0059-1 · Cited by 1,380
Business intelligence: data mining and optimization for decision making
Vercellis, C., Ahmadi, A., & Mohebi, A. (2016) · doi:10.5281/zenodo.13983826 · Cited by 398
Pincer-search: A new algorithm for discovering the maximum frequent set
Lin, D.-I., & Kedem, Z. M. (1998) · Lecture Notes in Computer Science · doi:10.1007/bfb0100980 · Cited by 277
Metadata
- Authors
- Park, J. S., Chen, M.-S., & Yu, P. S.
- Venue
- Proceedings of the 1995 ACM SIGMOD international conference on Management of data - SIGMOD '95
- Publisher
- ACM Press
- Published
- 1995
- Pages
- 175-186
- ISSN
- 0730-8078 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2030969394
- Cited by
- 1,406
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 40.15
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: An effective hash-based algorithm for mining association rules. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1145/223784.223813
- The paper
- Park, J. S., Chen, M.-S., & Yu, P. S. (1995). An effective hash-based algorithm for mining association rules. Proceedings of the 1995 ACM SIGMOD international conference on Management of data - SIGMOD '95. https://doi.org/10.1145/223784.223813
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.