The DOI matches its Crossref record; 46 of the 46 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Knowledge compilation and theory approximation
Open accessAbstract
Computational efficiency is a central concern in the design of knowledge representation systems. In order to obtain efficient systems, it has been suggested that one should limit the form of the statements in the knowledge base or use an incomplete inference mechanism. The former approach is often too restrictive for practical applications, whereas the latter leads to uncertainty about exactly what can and cannot be inferred from the knowledge base. We present a third alternative, in which knowledge given in a general representation language is translated (compiled) into a tractable form—allowing for efficient subsequent query answering. We show how propositional logical theories can be compiled into Horn theories that approximate the original information. The approximations bound the original theory from below and above in terms of logical strength. The procedures are extended to other tractable languages (for example, binary clauses) and to the first-order case. Finally, we demonstrate the generality of our approach by compiling concept descriptions in a general frame-based language into a tractable form.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
(1979) · Cited by 43,841
Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence
Brézillon, P., & Bouquet, P. (1999) · Cited by 7,473
The complexity of theorem-proving procedures
Cook, S. A. (1971) · Proceedings of the third annual ACM symposium on Theory of computing - STOC '71 · doi:10.1145/800157.805047 · Cited by 6,385
Valiant, L. G. (1984) · Communications of the ACM · doi:10.1145/1968.1972 · Cited by 3,279
A Computing Procedure for Quantification Theory
Davis, M., & Putnam, H. (1960) · Journal of the ACM · doi:10.1145/321033.321034 · Cited by 2,647
Proceedings of the 16th international joint conference on Artificial Intelligence - IJCAI '99
Colton, S., Bundy, A., & Walsh, T. (1999) · Cited by 2,500
Encyclopedia of Artificial Intelligence
(2009) · IGI Global eBooks · doi:10.4018/978-1-59904-849-9 · Cited by 1,396
On the Complexity of Derivation in Propositional Calculus
Tseitin, G. S. (1983) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-642-81955-1_28 · Cited by 1,211
A new method for solving hard satisfiability problems
Selman, B., Levesque, H. J., & Mitchell, D. G. M. (1992) · Cited by 1,156
Self-citationPlanning in a hierarchy of abstraction spaces
Sacerdoti, E. D. (1974) · Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.1016/0004-3702(74)90026-5 · Cited by 1,155
Metadata
- Authors
- Selman, B., & Kautz, H.
- Venue
- Journal of the ACM
- Published
- 1996-03
- Volume
- 43
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 193-224
- ISSN
- 0004-5411 (ISSN-L)
- 1557-735X
- OpenAlex
- W2038897673
- Cited by
- 295
- References
- 46
- FWCI
- 14.90
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Knowledge compilation and theory approximation. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1145/226643.226644
- The paper
- Selman, B., & Kautz, H. (1996). Knowledge compilation and theory approximation. Journal of the ACM. https://doi.org/10.1145/226643.226644
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.