The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
An experimental determination of sufficient mutant operators
Open accessAbstract
Mutation testing is a technique for unit-testing software that, although powerful, is computationally expensive, The principal expense of mutation is that many variants of the test program, called mutants, must be repeatedly executed.This article quantifies the expense of mutation in terms of the number of mutants that are created, then proposes and evaluates a technique that reduces the number of mutants by an order of magnitude.Selective mutation reduces.the cost of mutation testing by reducing the number of mutants, This article reports experimental results that compare selective mutation testing with standard, or nonselective, mutation testing, and results that quantify the savings achieved by selective mutation testing, The results support the hypothesis that selective mutation is almost as strong as nonselective mutation: in experimental trials selective mutation provides almost the same coverage as nonselective mutation.with a four-fold or more reduction in the number of mutants.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Constraint-based automatic test data generation
DeMilli, R. A., & Offutt, A. J. (1991) · IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering · doi:10.1109/32.92910 · Cited by 804
Self-citation
Cited by
An Analysis and Survey of the Development of Mutation Testing
Jia, Y., & Harman, M. (2011) · IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering · doi:10.1109/tse.2010.62 · Cited by 1,745
Using Mutation Analysis for Assessing and Comparing Testing Coverage Criteria
Andrews, J. H., Briand, L. C., Labiche, Y., & Namin, A. S. (2006) · IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering · doi:10.1109/tse.2006.83 · Cited by 481
Is mutation an appropriate tool for testing experiments?
Andrews, J. H., Brand, L. C., & Labiche, Y. (2005) · Proceedings. 27th International Conference on Software Engineering, 2005. ICSE 2005. · doi:10.1109/icse.2005.1553583 · Cited by 368
A mutation carol: Past, present and future
Offutt, J. (2011) · Information and Software Technology · doi:10.1016/j.infsof.2011.03.007 · Cited by 81
Hajrizi, E., Zylfiu, B., & Menxhiqi, L. (2019) · IFAC-PapersOnLine · doi:10.1016/j.ifacol.2019.12.493 · Cited by 3
Metadata
- Authors
- Offutt, A. J., Lee, A., Rothermel, G., Untch, R. H., & Zapf, C.
- Venue
- ACM Transactions on Software Engineering and Methodology
- Published
- 1996-04
- Volume
- 5
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 99-118
- ISSN
- 1049-331X (ISSN-L)
- 1557-7392
- OpenAlex
- W2121084350
- Cited by
- 650
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 25.11
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: An experimental determination of sufficient mutant operators. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1145/227607.227610
- The paper
- Offutt, A. J., Lee, A., Rothermel, G., Untch, R. H., & Zapf, C. (1996). An experimental determination of sufficient mutant operators. ACM Transactions on Software Engineering and Methodology. https://doi.org/10.1145/227607.227610
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.