The DOI matches its Crossref record.
RiskRanker: scalable and accurate zero-day android malware detection
Abstract
Smartphone sales have recently experienced explosive growth. Their popularity also encourages malware authors to penetrate various mobile marketplaces with malicious applications (or apps). These malicious apps hide in the sheer number of other normal apps, which makes their detection challenging. Existing mobile anti-virus software are inadequate in their reactive nature by relying on known malware samples for signature extraction. In this paper, we propose a proactive scheme to spot zero-day Android malware. Without relying on malware samples and their signatures, our scheme is motivated to assess potential security risks posed by these untrusted apps. Specifically, we have developed an automated system called RiskRanker to scalably analyze whether a particular app exhibits dangerous behavior (e.g., launching a root exploit or sending background SMS messages). The output is then used to produce a prioritized list of reduced apps that merit further investigation. When applied to examine 118,318 total apps collected from various Android markets over September and October 2011, our system takes less than four days to process all of them and effectively reports 3281 risky apps. Among these reported apps, we successfully uncovered 718 malware samples (in 29 families) and 322 of them are zero-day (in 11 families). These results demonstrate the efficacy and scalability of RiskRanker to police Android markets of all stripes.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
A Multimodal Deep Learning Method for Android Malware Detection Using Various Features
Kim, T., Kang, B., Rho, M., Sezer, S., & Im, E. G. (2019) · IEEE Transactions on Information Forensics and Security · doi:10.1109/tifs.2018.2866319 · Cited by 518
A Survey of App Store Analysis for Software Engineering
Martin, W., Sarro, F., Jia, Y., Zhang, Y., & Harman, M. (2017) · IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering · doi:10.1109/tse.2016.2630689 · Cited by 459
Application of deep learning to cybersecurity: A survey
Mahdavifar, S., & Ghorbani, A. A. (2019) · Neurocomputing · doi:10.1016/j.neucom.2019.02.056 · Cited by 325
AndroDialysis: Analysis of Android Intent Effectiveness in Malware Detection
Feizollah, A., Anuar, N. B., Salleh, R., Suarez-Tangil, G., & Furnell, S. (2017) · Computers & Security · doi:10.1016/j.cose.2016.11.007 · Cited by 267
The Spyware Used in Intimate Partner Violence
Chatterjee, R., Doerfler, P., Orgad, H., Havron, S., Palmer, J., Freed, D., Levy, K., Dell, N., McCoy, D., & Ristenpart, T. (2018) · 2018 IEEE Symposium on Security and Privacy (SP) · doi:10.1109/sp.2018.00061 · Cited by 142
Metadata
- Authors
- Grace, M., Zhou, Y., Zhang, Q., Zou, S., & Jiang, X.
- Venue
- Proceedings of the 10th international conference on Mobile systems, applications, and services
- Publisher
- ACM
- Published
- 2012-06-25
- Pages
- 281-294
- OpenAlex
- W2041276426
- Cited by
- 595
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 56.43
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: RiskRanker: scalable and accurate zero-day android malware detection. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1145/2307636.2307663
- The paper
- Grace, M., Zhou, Y., Zhang, Q., Zou, S., & Jiang, X. (2012). RiskRanker: scalable and accurate zero-day android malware detection. Proceedings of the 10th international conference on Mobile systems, applications, and services. https://doi.org/10.1145/2307636.2307663
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.