The DOI matches its Crossref record.
DIAM: towards a model for describing appropriation processes through the evolution of digital artifacts
Abstract
Appropriation of technology is a process by which users complete the work of designers by making interactive systems functional within the frame of their situated activities. While existing theories and studies about appropriation are oriented toward the psychological or organizational dimension of this process, we propose a model to describe it through evolutions of digital artifacts and information structures. We also present a case study demonstrating how this model helps to identify particular user operations, and related digital transformations, as a part of the appropriation process. These findings open perspectives to bridge scattered theoretical approaches of appropriation around a low-level, artifact-oriented, and objective way of describing appropriation. Our model could also improve the way appropriation is taken into account in design, by bringing more focus on technical aspects of interactive systems.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“This dynamic interplay opens up possibilities for localized adaptation and re-imagination by users, even in the face of seemingly powerful global technologies [10, 56, 105].”
From AI and Non-Western Art Worlds: Reimagining Critical AI Futures through Artistic Inquiry and Situated Dialogue (2025) · cites this paper as [10]
In the citing paper
“Belin and Prié [10] argue that these appropriations”
From AI and Non-Western Art Worlds: Reimagining Critical AI Futures through Artistic Inquiry and Situated Dialogue (2025) · cites this paper as [10]
In the citing paper
“HCI has long recognized that technologies are not simply used as designed, but are actively shaped and reconfigured by users to fit their needs and contexts [10, 18, 36, 46, 81, 105, 110].”
From AI and Non-Western Art Worlds: Reimagining Critical AI Futures through Artistic Inquiry and Situated Dialogue (2025) · cites this paper as [10]
Citations
Cites
Still being checked.
Research works printed but not linked: 17
- Carroll , J. Completing design in use: closing the appropriation cycle . In Proc. ECIS 2004 , 11. Carroll, J. Completing design in use: closing the appropriation cycle. In Proc. ECIS 2004, 11.
- DeSanctis , G. et Poole , M. S. Capturing the complexity in advanced technology use: Adaptive structuration theory . Organization science, ( 1994 ), 121--147. DeSanctis, G. et Poole, M. S. Capturing the complexity in advanced technology use: Adaptive structuration theory. Organization science, (1994), 121--147.
- 10.5555/1531407.1531415 · DOI
- 10.1023/A:1026149119426 · DOI
- 10.1016/S0953-5438(03)00057-2 · DOI
- 10.1145/1858171.1858222 · DOI
- 10.1145/642611.642616 · DOI · Paper page
- Indratmo , J. et Vassileva , J. A review of organizational structures of personal information management. Journal of digital information 9, 1 ( 2008 ). Indratmo, J. et Vassileva, J. A review of organizational structures of personal information management. Journal of digital information 9, 1 (2008).
- 10.1145/238857.238921 · DOI
- 10.1007/BF02716751 · DOI
- 10.1007/978-1-84628-901-9_10 · DOI
- Piaget , J. The development of thought: Equilibration of cognitive structures . Oxford, England : Viking , 1977 . Piaget, J. The development of thought: Equilibration of cognitive structures. Oxford, England: Viking, 1977.
- 10.1016/S0953-5438(02)00028-0 · DOI
- Rabardel , P. Les hommes et les technologies: approche cognitive des instruments contemporains . Paris , 1995 . Rabardel, P. Les hommes et les technologies: approche cognitive des instruments contemporains. Paris, 1995.
- 10.1145/1979742.1979585 · DOI
- 10.17011/ht/urn.200811065856 · DOI
- 10.1023/A:1008716330212 · DOI
Cited by
Qadri, R., Mirowski, P., & Denton, R. (2025) · Proceedings of the 2025 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems · doi:10.1145/3706598.3714049 · Cited by 12
Metadata
- Authors
- Belin, A., & Prié, Y.
- Affiliations
- Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (FR)
- ORCID
- Prié, Yannick
- Venue
- Proceedings of the Designing Interactive Systems Conference
- Publisher
- ACM
- Published
- 2012-06-11
- Pages
- 645-654
- OpenAlex
- W2095380896
- Cited by
- 31
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 3 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 1
- FWCI
- 2.02
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Designing Interactive Systems Conference (publishedVersion)
- HAL (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Human-Computer Interaction › Innovative Human-Technology Interaction
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Management Information Systems › Information Systems Theories and Implementation
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Human-Computer Interaction › Usability and User Interface Design
- Keywords
- technology appropriation, interactive systems, digital artifacts, information structure, user operation, digital transformation, situated action
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
