The DOI matches its Crossref record; 13 of the 13 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Workload analysis of a large-scale key-value store
Abstract
Key-value stores are a vital component in many scale-out enterprises, including social networks, online retail, and risk analysis. Accordingly, they are receiving increased attention from the research community in an effort to improve their performance, scalability, reliability, cost, and power consumption. To be effective, such efforts require a detailed understanding of realistic key-value workloads. And yet little is known about these workloads outside of the companies that operate them. This paper aims to address this gap. To this end, we have collected detailed traces from Facebook's Memcached deployment, arguably the world's largest. The traces capture over 284 billion requests from five different Memcached use cases over several days. We analyze the workloads from multiple angles, including: request composition, size, and rate; cache efficacy; temporal patterns; and application use cases. We also propose a simple model of the most representative trace to enable the generation of more realistic synthetic workloads by the community. Our analysis details many characteristics of the caching workload. It also reveals a number of surprises: a GET/SET ratio of 30:1 that is higher than assumed in the literature; some applications of Memcached behave more like persistent storage than a cache; strong locality metrics, such as keys accessed many millions of times a day, do not always suffice for a high hit rate; and there is still room for efficiency and hit rate improvements in Memcached's implementation. Toward the last point, we make several suggestions that address the exposed deficiencies.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Web caching and Zipf-like distributions: evidence and implications
Breslau, L., Cao, P., Fan, L., Phillips, G., & Shenker, S. (1999) · IEEE INFOCOM '99. Conference on Computer Communications. Proceedings. Eighteenth Annual Joint Conference of the IEEE Computer and Communications Societies. The Future is Now (Cat. No.99CH36320) · doi:10.1109/infcom.1999.749260 · Cited by 3,467
(2007) · doi:10.1145/1294261.1294281 · Cited by 3,447
Internet Web servers: workload characterization and performance implications
Arlitt, M. F., & Williamson, C. L. (1997) · IEEE/ACM Transactions on Networking · doi:10.1109/90.649565 · Cited by 730
FAWN: a fast array of wimpy nodes
Andersen, D. G., Franklin, J., Kaminsky, M., Phanishayee, A., Tan, L., & Vasudevan, V. (2009) · Proceedings of the ACM SIGOPS 22nd symposium on Operating systems principles · doi:10.1145/1629575.1629577 · Cited by 561
Jiang, S., & Zhang, X. (2002) · Proceedings of the 2002 ACM SIGMETRICS international conference on Measurement and modeling of computer systems · doi:10.1145/511334.511340 · Cited by 489
Self-citationThe workload on parallel supercomputers: modeling the characteristics of rigid jobs
Lublin, U., & Feitelson, D. G. (2003) · Journal of Parallel and Distributed Computing · doi:10.1016/s0743-7315(03)00108-4 · Cited by 441
Changes in Web client access patterns: Characteristics and caching implications
Barford, P., Bestavros, A., Bradley, A., & Crovella, M. (1999) · World Wide Web · doi:10.1023/a:1019236319752 · Cited by 373
SILT: a memory-efficient, high-performance key-value store
Lim, H., Fan, B., Andersen, D. G., & Kaminsky, M. (2011) · Proceedings of the Twenty-Third ACM Symposium on Operating Systems Principles · doi:10.1145/2043556.2043558 · Cited by 294
FlashStore: high throughput persistent key-value store
Debnath, B. K., Sengupta, S., & Li, J. (2010) · Proceedings of the VLDB Endowment · doi:10.14778/1920841.1921015 · Cited by 237
Web search using mobile cores: quantifying and mitigating the price of efficiency
Janapa Reddi, V., Lee, B. C., Chilimbi, T., & Vaid, K. (2010) · Proceedings of the 37th annual international symposium on Computer architecture · doi:10.1145/1815961.1816002 · Cited by 194
Cited by
Development and Deployment at Facebook
Feitelson, D. G., Frachtenberg, E., & Beck, K. L. (2013) · IEEE Internet Computing · doi:10.1109/mic.2013.25 · Cited by 243
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Atikoglu, B., Xu, Y., Frachtenberg, E., Jiang, S., & Paleczny, M.
- Venue
- ACM SIGMETRICS Performance Evaluation Review
- Published
- 2012-06-07
- Volume
- 40
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 53-64
- ISSN
- 0163-5999 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2998553639
- Cited by
- 268
- References
- 13
- FWCI
- 10.13
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Workload analysis of a large-scale key-value store. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1145/2318857.2254766
- The paper
- Atikoglu, B., Xu, Y., Frachtenberg, E., Jiang, S., & Paleczny, M. (2012). Workload analysis of a large-scale key-value store. ACM SIGMETRICS Performance Evaluation Review. https://doi.org/10.1145/2318857.2254766
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.