Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 68Advanced Database Systems and QueriesAdvanced Software Engineering MethodologiesBusiness Process Modeling and Analysis

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 22 of the 22 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

A basic model for proactive event-driven computing

Engel, Yagil, Etzion, Opher, Feldman, Zohar·2012·Proceedings of the 6th ACM International Conference on Distributed Event-Based Systems

Abstract

During the movie "Source Code" there is a shift in the plot; from (initially) reacting to a train explosion that already occurred and trying to eliminate further explosions, to (later) changing the reality to avoid the original train explosion. Whereas changing the history after events have happened is still within the science fiction domain, changing the reality to avoid events that have not happened yet is, in many cases, feasible, and may yield significant benefits. We use the term proactive behavior to designate the change of what will be reality in the future. In particular, we focus on proactive event-driven computing: the use of event-driven systems to predict future events and react to them before they occur. In this paper we start our investigation of this large area by constructing a model and end-to-end implementation of a restricted subset of basic proactive applications that is trying to eliminate a single forecasted event, selecting between a finite and relatively small set of feasible actions, known at design time, based on quantified cost functions over time. After laying out the model, we describe the extensions required of the conceptual architecture of event processing to support such applications: supporting proactive agents as part of the model, supporting the derivation of forecasted events, and supporting various aspects of uncertainty; next, we show a decision algorithm that selects among the alternatives. We demonstrate the approach by implementing an…

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1145/2335484.2335496

Cites

22 of 22 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 22 references

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. SK Sethiya . Condition based maintenance (cbm) . 2006 . SK Sethiya. Condition based maintenance (cbm). 2006.

Cited by

See all 68

Metadata

Authors
Engel, Y., Etzion, O., & Feldman, Z.
Affiliations
IBM Research - Haifa (IL)
Venue
Proceedings of the 6th ACM International Conference on Distributed Event-Based Systems
Publisher
ACM
Published
2012-07-16
Pages
107-118
OpenAlex
W2016575485
Cited by
67
References
22
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 10 · 2015: 9 · 2014: 8 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 1
FWCI
6.17
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
ACM International Conference on Distributed and Event-Based Systems (DEBS) (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Advanced Database Systems and Queries
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Software › Advanced Software Engineering Methodologies
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Management Information Systems › Business Process Modeling and Analysis
Keywords
event processing, proactive agents, event prediction, decision making under uncertainty, condition-based maintenance

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A basic model for proactive event-driven computing. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1145/2335484.2335496
The paper
Engel, Y., Etzion, O., & Feldman, Z. (2012). A basic model for proactive event-driven computing. Proceedings of the 6th ACM International Conference on Distributed Event-Based Systems. https://doi.org/10.1145/2335484.2335496

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.