The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Analysis of benchmark characteristics and benchmark performance prediction
Open accessAbstract
Standard benchmarking provides to run-times for given programs on given machines, but fails to provide insight as to why those results were obtained (either in terms of machine or program characteristics) and fails to provide run-times for that program on some other machine, or some other programs on that machine. We have developed a machine-imdependent model of program execution to characterize both machine performance and program execution. By merging these machine and program characterizations, we can estimate execution time for arbitrary machine/program combinations. Our technique allows us to identify those operations, either on the machine or in the programs, which dominate the benchmark results. This information helps designers in improving the performance of future machines and users in tuning their applications to better utilize the performance of existing machines. Here we apply our methodology to characterize benchmarks and predict their execution times. We present extensive run-time statistics for a large set of benchmarks including the SPEC and Perfect Club suites. We show how these statistics can be used to identify important shortcoming in the programs. In addition, we give execution time estimates for a large sample of programs and machines and compare these against benchmark results. Finally, we develop a metric for program similarity that makes it possible to classify benchmarks with respect to a large set of characteristics.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Improving performance via mini-applications.
Crozier, P., Thornquist, H., Numrich, R., Williams, A., Edwards, H., Keiter, E., Rajan, M., Willenbring, J., Doerfler, D., & Heroux, M. (2009) · doi:10.2172/993908 · Cited by 448
A genetic algorithms approach to modeling the performance of memory-bound computations
Tikir, M. M., Carrington, L., Strohmaier, E., & Snavely, A. (2007) · Proceedings of the 2007 ACM/IEEE conference on Supercomputing · doi:10.1145/1362622.1362686 · Cited by 66
CarFast: achieving higher statement coverage faster
Park, S., Hossain, B. M. M., Hussain, I., Csallner, C., Grechanik, M., Taneja, K., Fu, C., & Xie, Q. (2012) · Proceedings of the ACM SIGSOFT 20th International Symposium on the Foundations of Software Engineering · doi:10.1145/2393596.2393636 · Cited by 55
Metadata
- Authors
- Saavedra, R. H., & Smith, A. J.
- Venue
- ACM Transactions on Computer Systems
- Published
- 1996-11
- Volume
- 14
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 344-384
- ISSN
- 0734-2071 (ISSN-L)
- 1557-7333
- OpenAlex
- W2019436626
- Cited by
- 209
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 4.88
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Analysis of benchmark characteristics and benchmark performance prediction. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1145/235543.235545
- The paper
- Saavedra, R. H., & Smith, A. J. (1996). Analysis of benchmark characteristics and benchmark performance prediction. ACM Transactions on Computer Systems. https://doi.org/10.1145/235543.235545
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.