Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 263

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Why are CASE tools not used?

Open access
Iivari, Juhani·1996·Communications of the ACM
DOI 10.1145/236156.236183
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

article Free Access Share on Why are CASE tools not used? Author: Juhani Iivari Department of Information Processing Science, University of Oulu, Finland Department of Information Processing Science, University of Oulu, FinlandView Profile Authors Info & Claims Communications of the ACMVolume 39Issue 10Oct. 1996 pp 94–103https://doi.org/10.1145/236156.236183Published:01 October 1996Publication History 184citation2,995DownloadsMetricsTotal Citations184Total Downloads2,995Last 12 Months159Last 6 weeks39 Get Citation AlertsNew Citation Alert added!This alert has been successfully added and will be sent to:You will be notified whenever a record that you have chosen has been cited.To manage your alert preferences, click on the button below.Manage my Alerts New Citation Alert!Please log in to your account Save to BinderSave to BinderCreate a New BinderNameCancelCreateExport CitationPublisher SiteeReaderPDF

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1145/236156.236183

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 1 references

Cited by

See all 263

Metadata

Authors
Iivari, J.
Venue
Communications of the ACM
Publisher
Association for Computing Machinery (ACM)
Published
1996-10
Volume
39
Issue
10
Pages
94-103
ISSN
  • 0001-0782 (ISSN-L)
  • 1557-7317
DOI
10.1145/236156.236183
OpenAlex
W2001961185
Cited by
263
References
1
FWCI
31.27
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Why are CASE tools not used? https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1145/236156.236183
The paper
Iivari, J. (1996). Why are CASE tools not used? Communications of the ACM. https://doi.org/10.1145/236156.236183

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.