The DOI matches its Crossref record.
The reflexive CHAM and the join-calculus
Open accessAbstract
By adding reflexion to the chemical machine of Berry and Boudol, we obtain a formal model of concurrency that is consistent with mobility and distribution. Our model provides the foundations of a programming language with functional and object-oriented features. It can also be seen as a process calculus, the join-calculus, which we prove equivalent to the π-calculus of Milner, Parrow and Walker.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Cardelli, L., & Gordon, A. D. (1998) · Lecture Notes in Computer Science · doi:10.1007/bfb0053547 · Cited by 455
CONVENT, L., LINDLEY, S., MCBRIDE, C., & MCLAUGHLIN, C. (2020) · Journal of Functional Programming · doi:10.1017/s0956796820000039 · Cited by 39
Metadata
- Authors
- Fournet, C., & Gonthier, G.
- Venue
- Proceedings of the 23rd ACM SIGPLAN-SIGACT symposium on Principles of programming languages - POPL '96
- Publisher
- ACM Press
- Published
- 1996
- Pages
- 372-385
- OpenAlex
- W2050942832
- Cited by
- 456
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 20.60
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The reflexive CHAM and the join-calculus. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1145/237721.237805
- The paper
- Fournet, C., & Gonthier, G. (1996). The reflexive CHAM and the join-calculus. Proceedings of the 23rd ACM SIGPLAN-SIGACT symposium on Principles of programming languages - POPL '96. https://doi.org/10.1145/237721.237805
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
