Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 214

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

A threshold of ln n for approximating set cover (preliminary version)

Open access
Feige, Uriel·1996·Proceedings of the twenty-eighth annual ACM symposium on Theory of computing - STOC '96

Abstract

We prove that (] -o(]))lnn is a threshold below which set, cover cannot be approximated efficiently, unless NP has slightly superpolynornial time algorithms.This closes tlw gap (up to low order terms) between the ratio of ap-prox&ation achievable by the greedy algorithm (which is (1 -O( 1 ) ) in n), and previous results of Lund and Yannakakis, that showed harclness of approximation within a ratio of (log2 7/)/2 E 0.7.?111 //,, 1

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1145/237814.237977

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 1 references

Cited by

See all 214

Metadata

Authors
Feige, U.
Venue
Proceedings of the twenty-eighth annual ACM symposium on Theory of computing - STOC '96
Publisher
ACM Press
Published
1996
Pages
314-318
OpenAlex
W2000869424
Cited by
214
References
1
FWCI
17.14
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A threshold of ln n for approximating set cover (preliminary version). https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1145/237814.237977
The paper
Feige, U. (1996). A threshold of ln n for approximating set cover (preliminary version). Proceedings of the twenty-eighth annual ACM symposium on Theory of computing - STOC '96. https://doi.org/10.1145/237814.237977

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.