The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Multimodal interfaces for dynamic interactive maps
Abstract
Dynamic interactive maps with transparent but power-ful human interface capabilities are beginning to emerge for a variety of geographical information systems, in-cluding ones situated on portables for travelers, stu-dents, business and service people, and others working in field settings. In the present research, interfaces sup-porting spoken, pen-based, and multimodal input were analyze for their potential effectiveness in interacting with this new generation of map systems. Input modal-ity (speech, writing, multimodal) and map display for-mat (highly versus minimally structured) were varied in a within-subject factorial design as people completed re-alistic tasks with a simulated map system. The results identified a constellation of performance difficulties asso-ciated with speech-only map interactions, including ele-vated performance errors, spontaneous disfluencies, and lengthier task completion time-- problems that declined substantially when people could interact multimodally with the map. These performance advantages also mir-rored a strong user preference to interact multimodally. The error-proneness and unacceptability of speech-only input to maps was attributed in large part to people's difficulty generating spoken descriptions of spatial loca-tion. Analyses also indicated that map display format can be used to minimize performance errors and dis-fluencies, and map interfaces that guide users ' speech toward brevity can nearly eliminate disfiuencies. Impli-cations of this research are discussed for the design of high-performance multimodal interfaces for future map systems.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Oviatt, S. L., Cohen, P. R., & Wang, M. (1994) · Speech Communication · doi:10.1016/0167-6393(94)90079-5 · Cited by 76 · cited 4×
“This finding replicates and generalizes the linear predictive model between utterance length and spoken disfluencies reported previously by Oviatt and colleagues [ 11 , 8], which was based on human-computer interaction involving verbal and quantitative content.”
BackgroundResultInfluentialSelf-citation
Cited by
QuickSet: multimodal interaction for distributed applications
Cohen, P. R., Johnston, M., McGee, D., Oviatt, S., Pittman, J., Smith, I., Chen, L., & Clow, J. (1997) · Proceedings of the fifth ACM international conference on Multimedia - MULTIMEDIA '97 · doi:10.1145/266180.266328 · Cited by 466
Self-citationMultimodal integration-a statistical view
Wu, L., Oviatt, S. L., & Cohen, P. R. (1999) · IEEE Transactions on Multimedia · doi:10.1109/6046.807953 · Cited by 190
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Oviatt, S.
- Venue
- Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human factors in computing systems common ground - CHI '96
- Publisher
- ACM Press
- Published
- 1996
- Pages
- 95-102
- OpenAlex
- W1975885651
- Cited by
- 174
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 12.10
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Multimodal interfaces for dynamic interactive maps. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1145/238386.238438
- The paper
- Oviatt, S. (1996). Multimodal interfaces for dynamic interactive maps. Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human factors in computing systems common ground - CHI '96. https://doi.org/10.1145/238386.238438
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.