Automatic detection of pain intensity
Open accessAbstract
Previous efforts suggest that occurrence of pain can be detected from the face. Can intensity of pain be detected as well? The Prkachin and Solomon Pain Intensity (PSPI) metric was used to classify four levels of pain intensity (none, trace, weak, and strong) in 25 participants with previous shoulder injury (McMaster-UNBC Pain Archive). Participants were recorded while they completed a series of movements of their affected and unaffected shoulders. From the video recordings, canonical normalized appearance of the face (CAPP) was extracted using active appearance modeling. To control for variation in face size, all CAPP were rescaled to 96×96 pixels. CAPP then was passed through a set of Log-Normal filters consisting of 7 frequencies and 15 orientations to extract 9216 features. To detect pain level, 4 support vector machines (SVMs) were separately trained for the automatic measurement of pain intensity on a frame-by-frame level using both 5-folds cross-validation and leave-one-subject-out cross-validation. F1 for each level of pain intensity ranged from 91% to 96% and from 40% to 67% for 5-folds and leave-one-subject-out cross-validation, respectively. Intra-class correlation, which assesses the consistency of continuous pain intensity between manual and automatic PSPI was 0.85 and 0.55 for 5-folds and leave-one-subject-out cross-validation, respectively, which suggests moderate to high consistency. These findings show that pain intensity can be reliably measured from facial expression in participants with orthopedic injury.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 30 · Cited by 185
Research works printed but not linked: 3
- [8]Ekman P, Friesen WV. (1978). Manual for the Facial Action Coding System. Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists Press; 1978.
- [11]Hammal Z, Context based Recognition of Pain Expression Intensities. The 5th Workshop on Emotion in Human-Computer Interaction - Real World Challenges -held at the 23rd BCS HCI Group conference Cambridge University, Cambridge, UK, September 2009 (Fraunhofer VERLAG, 2010).
- [16]Lucey P, Cohn JF, Howlett J, Member SL, & Sridharan S (2011). Recognizing emotion with head pose variation: Identifying pain segments in video. Systems, Man, and Cybernetics – Part B, 41(3), 664– 674. PMC6942457 21097382
- Authors
- Hammal, Z., & Cohn, J. F.
- Affiliations
- Carnegie Mellon University (US)
- University of Pittsburgh (US)
- Venue
- Proceedings of the 14th ACM international conference on Multimodal interaction
- Publisher
- ACM
- Published
- 2012-10-22
- Volume
- 2012
- Pages
- 47-52
- PMC
- PMC7385931
- OpenAlex
- W1978963692
- Cited by
- 185
- References
- 30
- Citations by year
- 2026: 9 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 19 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 23 · 2020: 21 · 2019: 10 · 2018: 12 · 2017: 13 · 2016: 22 · 2015: 16 · 2014: 10 · 2013: 5
- FWCI
- 19.17
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
- Locations
- INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON MULTIMODAL INTERACTION (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
- Funders
- National Institute of Mental Health (R01MH051435)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Emotion and Mood Recognition
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Face recognition and analysis
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Face Recognition and Perception
- Keywords
- pain intensity, facial expressions, pain intensity classification, shoulder injuries, active appearance models, support vector machine, video-based pain assessment, orthopedic trauma
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review