Cited by 61Topic ModelingNatural Language Processing TechniquesSentiment Analysis and Opinion Mining

Named entity recognition for tweets

Liu, Xiaohua, Wei, Furu, Zhang, Shaodian, Zhou, Ming·2013·ACM Transactions on Intelligent Systems and Technology

Abstract

Two main challenges of Named Entity Recognition (NER) for tweets are the insufficient information in a tweet and the lack of training data. We propose a novel method consisting of three core elements: (1) normalization of tweets; (2) combination of a K-Nearest Neighbors (KNN) classifier with a linear Conditional Random Fields (CRF) model; and (3) semisupervised learning framework. The tweet normalization preprocessing corrects common ill-formed words using a global linear model. The KNN-based classifier conducts prelabeling to collect global coarse evidence across tweets while the CRF model conducts sequential labeling to capture fine-grained information encoded in a tweet. The semisupervised learning plus the gazetteers alleviate the lack of training data. Extensive experiments show the advantages of our method over the baselines as well as the effectiveness of normalization, KNN, and semisupervised learning.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1145/2414425.2414428

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Liu, X., Wei, F., Zhang, S., & Zhou, M.
Affiliations
  • Harbin Institute of Technology (CN)
  • Microsoft Research Asia (China) (CN)
  • Shanghai Jiao Tong University (CN)
Venue
ACM Transactions on Intelligent Systems and Technology
Published
2013-01
Volume
4
Issue
1
Pages
1-15
ISSN
  • 2157-6904 (ISSN-L)
  • 2157-6912
OpenAlex
W2048613595
Cited by
61
References
0
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 9 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 1
FWCI
8.46
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
ACM Transactions on Intelligent Systems and Technology (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Topic Modeling
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Natural Language Processing Techniques
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Sentiment Analysis and Opinion Mining
Keywords
named entity recognition, tweets, k-nearest neighbors, conditional random fields, semi-supervised learning, gazetteers, limited training data, social media text

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review