Named entity recognition for tweets
Abstract
Two main challenges of Named Entity Recognition (NER) for tweets are the insufficient information in a tweet and the lack of training data. We propose a novel method consisting of three core elements: (1) normalization of tweets; (2) combination of a K-Nearest Neighbors (KNN) classifier with a linear Conditional Random Fields (CRF) model; and (3) semisupervised learning framework. The tweet normalization preprocessing corrects common ill-formed words using a global linear model. The KNN-based classifier conducts prelabeling to collect global coarse evidence across tweets while the CRF model conducts sequential labeling to capture fine-grained information encoded in a tweet. The semisupervised learning plus the gazetteers alleviate the lack of training data. Extensive experiments show the advantages of our method over the baselines as well as the effectiveness of normalization, KNN, and semisupervised learning.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
'NER for tweets' is a problem that many people have studied.
“third, 'NER for tweets' is a problem that many people have studied [15, 33, 49].”
From Who Validates the Validators? Aligning LLM-Assisted Evaluation of LLM Outputs with Human Preferences (2024) · cites this paper as [33]
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Who Validates the Validators? Aligning LLM-Assisted Evaluation of LLM Outputs with Human Preferences
Shankar, S., Zamfirescu-Pereira, J. D., Hartmann, B., Parameswaran, A., & Arawjo, I. (2024) · Proceedings of the 37th Annual ACM Symposium on User Interface Software and Technology · doi:10.1145/3654777.3676450 · Cited by 151 · see citing works
- Authors
- Liu, X., Wei, F., Zhang, S., & Zhou, M.
- Affiliations
- Harbin Institute of Technology (CN)
- Microsoft Research Asia (China) (CN)
- Shanghai Jiao Tong University (CN)
- Venue
- ACM Transactions on Intelligent Systems and Technology
- Published
- 2013-01
- Volume
- 4
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 1-15
- ISSN
- 2157-6904 (ISSN-L)
- 2157-6912
- OpenAlex
- W2048613595
- Cited by
- 61
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2025: 1 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 9 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 1
- FWCI
- 8.46
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- ACM Transactions on Intelligent Systems and Technology (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Topic Modeling
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Natural Language Processing Techniques
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Sentiment Analysis and Opinion Mining
- Keywords
- named entity recognition, tweets, k-nearest neighbors, conditional random fields, semi-supervised learning, gazetteers, limited training data, social media text
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review