Cited by 12

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Panel on use of proprietary data

Callan, Jamie, Moffat, Alistair·2012·ACM SIGIR Forum

Abstract

A panel discussion on the use of proprietary data was held at SIGIR 2012 in Portland. This report summarizes the positions put forward by the six panelists and the points that arose during the wider discussion that followed.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1145/2422256.2422258

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Show all 1 references

Research works printed but not linked: 5

  1. 10.1145/2215676.2215678 · DOI
  2. 10.1145/1645953.1646031 · DOI
  3. 10.1145/1409220.1409222 · DOI
  4. Bernardo Huberman . Big data deserve a bigger audience . Nature , 482 , 2012 . Bernardo Huberman. Big data deserve a bigger audience. Nature, 482, 2012.
  5. John Markoff . Troves of personal data, forbidden to researchers . The New York Times , May 21, 2012 . John Markoff. Troves of personal data, forbidden to researchers. The New York Times, May 21, 2012.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 12

Metadata

Authors
Callan, J., & Moffat, A.
Affiliations
  • School of Computer Science, Carnegie Mellon University
  • Department of Computing and Information Systems, The University of Melbourne
Venue
ACM SIGIR Forum
Published
2012-12-21
Volume
46
Issue
2
Pages
10-18
ISSN
0163-5840
Cited by
12
References
1
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review