Attention-based addressee selection for service and social robots to interact with multiple persons
Abstract
For robots to perform interaction with multiple persons, they have to be able to identify the addressees to interact with. We classify the methods of addressee detection and selection into two categories, namely, passive and active approaches. For passive approaches, the robot is programmed to detect a predefined signal, e.g., a voice command or a specific gesture, from a person who is supposed to be the addressee. In contrast, for active approaches, the robot is able to select a person as an addressee based on subtle cues that are inferred from the human pose, gaze, and facial expression. We present two new approaches for attention-based addressee selection, one is a passive method and the other is an active method. The passive method is designed for the robot to recognize common hand-waving gesture, where a Bayessian ensemble approach is proposed to fuse hand detections from depth segmentation, palm shape, skin color, and body pose. The active method is developed for the robot to perform natural interaction with multiple persons. It employs a novel human attention estimation algorithm based on human detection, tracking, upper body pose recogni-tion, face detection, gaze detection, lip motion analysis, and facial expression recognition. Extensive experiments have been conducted and the effectiveness of the proposed approaches is reported.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Shoulder orientation and head pose can be used as proxies for intensity of attention towards Louise.
“It combines the measures of orientation of the user's shoulders [15] [16] and head pose [17], seen here as proxies for his or her intensity of attention towards Louise.”
From Field evaluation with cognitively-impaired older adults of attention management in the Embodied Conversational Agent Louise (2016) · cites this paper as [16]
No citation lists for this paper
No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.
References 11 · Cited by 20
- Authors
- Li, L., Xu, Q., & Tan, Y. K.
- Affiliations
- Institute for Infocomm Research (SG)
- ORCID
- Venue
- Proceedings of the Workshop at SIGGRAPH Asia
- Publisher
- ACM
- Published
- 2012-11-26
- Pages
- 131-136
- OpenAlex
- W2158227850
- Cited by
- 20
- References
- 11
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 2 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 4
- FWCI
- 3.85
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Workshop at SIGGRAPH Asia (WASA) (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Social Robot Interaction and HRI
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Speech and dialogue systems
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Human-Computer Interaction › Hand Gesture Recognition Systems
- Keywords
- service robots, social robots, multi-person interaction, Bayesian ensemble, depth segmentation, gaze detection, facial expression recognition, human detection and tracking
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review