Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 822

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Reexamining the cluster hypothesis: scatter/gather on retrieval results

Open access
Hearst, Marti A., Pedersen, Jan O.·1996·Proceedings of the 19th annual international ACM SIGIR conference on Research and development in information retrieval - SIGIR '96

Abstract

We present Scatter/Gather, a cluster-based document browsing method, as an alternative to ranked titles for the organization and viewing of retrieval results.We systematically evaluate Scatter/Gather in this context and find significant improvements over similarity search ranking alone.This result provides evidence validating the cluster hypothesis which states that relevant documents tend to be more similar to each other than to non-relevant documents.We describe a system employing Scatter/Gather and demonstrate that users are able to use this system close to its full potential.1

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1145/243199.243216

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 822

Metadata

Authors
Hearst, M. A., & Pedersen, J. O.
Venue
Proceedings of the 19th annual international ACM SIGIR conference on Research and development in information retrieval - SIGIR '96
Publisher
ACM Press
Published
1996
Pages
76-84
OpenAlex
W2074449313
Cited by
822
References
0
FWCI
28.98
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Reexamining the cluster hypothesis: scatter/gather on retrieval results. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1145/243199.243216
The paper
Hearst, M. A., & Pedersen, J. O. (1996). Reexamining the cluster hypothesis: scatter/gather on retrieval results. Proceedings of the 19th annual international ACM SIGIR conference on Research and development in information retrieval - SIGIR '96. https://doi.org/10.1145/243199.243216

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.