The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Combining classifiers in text categorization
Abstract
Three different types of classifiers were investigated in the context of a text categorization problem in the medical domain: the automatic assignment of ICD9 codes to dictated inpatient discharge summaries. K-nearest-neighbor, relevance feedback, and Bayesian independence classifers were applied individually and in combination. A combination of different classifiers produced better results than any single type of classifier. For this specific medical categorization problem, new query formulation and weighting methods used in the k-nearest-neighbor classifier improved performance. 1 Introduction Past research in information retrieval has shown that one can improve retrieval effectiveness by using multiple representations in indexing and query formulation [27] [19] [3] [11] and by using multiple search strategies [5] [24] [7]. In this work, we investigate whether we can attain similar improvements in the domain of text categorization by combining different representations and classif...
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Automatic Indexing: An Experimental Inquiry
Maron, M. E. (1961) · Journal of the ACM · doi:10.1145/321075.321084 · Cited by 570
Cited by
Text classification from labeled and unlabeled documents using EM
Nigam, K., Mccallum, A. K., Thrun, S., & Mitchell, T. (2000) · Machine Learning · doi:10.1023/a:1007692713085 · Cited by 2,736
Ensemble of feature sets and classification algorithms for sentiment classification
Xia, R., Zong, C., & Li, S. (2011) · Information Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.ins.2010.11.023 · Cited by 583
Kaur, R., Ginige, J. A., & Obst, O. (2023) · Expert Systems with Applications · doi:10.1016/j.eswa.2022.118997 · Cited by 48
Automatically Identifying Health Outcome Information in MEDLINE Records
Demner-Fushman, D., Few, B., Hauser, S. E., & Thoma, G. (2006) · Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association · doi:10.1197/jamia.m1911 · Cited by 35
Ensemble Method for Sexual Predators Identification in Online Chats
Fauzi, M. A., & Bours, P. (2020) · 2020 8th International Workshop on Biometrics and Forensics (IWBF) · doi:10.1109/iwbf49977.2020.9107945 · Cited by 34
Metadata
- Authors
- Larkey, L. S., & Croft, W. B.
- Venue
- Proceedings of the 19th annual international ACM SIGIR conference on Research and development in information retrieval - SIGIR '96
- Publisher
- ACM Press
- Published
- 1996
- Pages
- 289-297
- OpenAlex
- W1989568037
- Cited by
- 410
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 10.98
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Combining classifiers in text categorization. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1145/243199.243276
- The paper
- Larkey, L. S., & Croft, W. B. (1996). Combining classifiers in text categorization. Proceedings of the 19th annual international ACM SIGIR conference on Research and development in information retrieval - SIGIR '96. https://doi.org/10.1145/243199.243276
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.