Cited by 8Innovative Teaching and Learning MethodsInnovative Education and Learning PracticesInformation Systems Theories and Implementation

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

CSCW and education: viewing education as a site of work practice

Wardrip, Peter Samuelson, Shapiro, R. Benjamin, Forte, Andrea, Maroulis, Spiro, Brennan, Karen, Roque, Ricarose·2013·Proceedings of the 2013 conference on Computer supported cooperative work companion

Abstract

Educational institutions, whether they are formal or informal, present a work environment in which technology, and social and cultural interactions mediate unfolding work. The interaction between CSCW and the work of education can hold great potential for both improving the educational institutions as well as providing greater explanatory power to CSCW theories that support the work of groups and the designs that are instantiated in those theories. The goal of this workshop is to build a community interested in the intersection between CSCW and educational work practice.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1145/2441955.2442035

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 13

  1. 10.1016/j.compedu.2011.09.001 · DOI
  2. 10.1287/orsc.12.1.76.10122 · DOI
  3. Brennan , K. Mind the gap: Differences between the aspirational and the actual in an online community of learners . CSCL'11 conference proceedings , ( 2011 ), 342--349. Brennan, K. Mind the gap: Differences between the aspirational and the actual in an online community of learners. CSCL'11 conference proceedings, (2011), 342--349.
  4. Bryk , A. S. , Gomez , L. M. , & Grunow , A. Getting ideas into action: Building networked improvement communities in education . In M. Hallinan (Ed.), Frontiers in Sociology of Education. New York, NY : Springer . ( 2011 ). Bryk, A. S., Gomez, L. M., & Grunow, A. Getting ideas into action: Building networked improvement communities in education. In M. Hallinan (Ed.), Frontiers in Sociology of Education. New York, NY: Springer. (2011).
  5. Dolle , J. , Wardrip , P. S. , Russell , J. L. , Gomez , L. M. & Bryk , A. S. The power of educational improvement networks: A preliminary exploration . ICLS '12 conference proceedings , ( 2012 ). Dolle, J., Wardrip, P. S., Russell, J. L., Gomez, L. M. & Bryk, A. S. The power of educational improvement networks: A preliminary exploration. ICLS '12 conference proceedings, (2012).
  6. Forte , A. , Humphreys , M. & Park , T. Grassroots professional development: How teachers use Twitter . Proceedings of the International Conference on Weblogs and Social Media (ICWSM). ( 2012 ). Forte, A., Humphreys, M. & Park, T. Grassroots professional development: How teachers use Twitter. Proceedings of the International Conference on Weblogs and Social Media (ICWSM). (2012).
  7. 10.1111/0161-4681.00140 · DOI
  8. Kelley T. M. & Johnston E. (forthcoming). An exploration of serious game platforms on direct citizen participation. Public Administration Quarterly. Kelley T. M. & Johnston E. (forthcoming). An exploration of serious game platforms on direct citizen participation. Public Administration Quarterly.
  9. Lortie , D. Schoolteacher: A sociological study . Chicago : University of Chicago Press , ( 2002 ). Lortie, D. Schoolteacher: A sociological study. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, (2002). · DOI
  10. McLaughlin , M. W. & Talbert , J. E. Professional communities and the work of high school teaching . Chicago, Il : University of Chicago Press , ( 2001 ). McLaughlin, M. W. & Talbert, J. E. Professional communities and the work of high school teaching. Chicago, Il: University of Chicago Press, (2001).
  11. 10.2307/3250927 · DOI
  12. Shapiro , R. B. & Wardrip , P. S. Interactive representations of student activity to inform teacher collaborations: Results from a formative exploration . CSCL '11 Proceedings , ( 2011 ). Shapiro, R. B. & Wardrip, P. S. Interactive representations of student activity to inform teacher collaborations: Results from a formative exploration. CSCL '11 Proceedings, (2011).
  13. Shulman , L. S. Disciplines of inquiry: An overview . In Richard M. Jaeger (Ed). Complementary methods of researchers in education. (3--17) . American Education Research Association : Washington, D.C. , 1997 . Shulman, L. S. Disciplines of inquiry: An overview. In Richard M. Jaeger (Ed). Complementary methods of researchers in education. (3--17). American Education Research Association: Washington, D.C., 1997.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Wardrip, P. S., Shapiro, R. B., Forte, A., Maroulis, S., Brennan, K., & Roque, R.
Affiliations
  • University of Pittsburgh (US)
  • Tufts University (US)
  • Drexel University (US)
  • Arizona State University (US)
  • Harvard University (US)
  • Massachusetts Institute of Technology (US)
Venue
Proceedings of the 2013 conference on Computer supported cooperative work companion
Publisher
ACM
Published
2013-02-23
Pages
333-336
OpenAlex
W1983526537
Cited by
8
References
0
Citations by year
2024: 1 · 2023: 4 · 2021: 1 · 2018: 1 · 2015: 1
FWCI
0.72
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW) (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Innovative Teaching and Learning Methods
  • Social Sciences › Education › Innovative Education and Learning Practices
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Management Information Systems › Information Systems Theories and Implementation
Keywords
computer-supported cooperative work, educational institutions, collaboration, educational technology, social and cultural interaction, group work

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review