The DOI matches its Crossref record.
The Tapenade automatic differentiation tool: Principles, model, and specification
Open accessAbstract
Tapenade is an Automatic Differentiation (AD) tool which, given a Fortran or C code that computes a function, creates a new code that computes its tangent or adjoint derivatives. Tapenade puts particular emphasis on adjoint differentiation, which computes gradients at a remarkably low cost. This article describes the principles of Tapenade, a subset of the general principles of AD. We motivate and illustrate with examples the AD model of Tapenade, that is, the structure of differentiated codes and the strategies used to make them more efficient. Along with this informal description, we formally specify this model by means of data-flow equations and rules of Operational Semantics, making this the reference specification of the tangent and adjoint modes of Tapenade. One benefit we expect from this formal specification is the capacity to formally study the AD model itself, especially for the adjoint mode and its sophisticated strategies. This article also describes the architectural choices of the implementation of Tapenade. We describe the current performance of Tapenade on a set of codes that include industrial-size applications. We present the extensions of the tool that are planned in a foreseeable future, deriving from our ongoing research on AD.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Universal Differential Equations for Scientific Machine Learning
Rackauckas, C., Ma, Y., Martensen, J., Warner, C., Zubov, K., Supekar, R., Skinner, D., Ramadhan, A., & Edelman, A. (2020) · doi:10.21203/rs.3.rs-55125/v1 · Cited by 643
Machine-Learning-Augmented Predictive Modeling of Turbulent Separated Flows over Airfoils
Singh, A. P., Medida, S., & Duraisamy, K. (2017) · AIAA Journal · doi:10.2514/1.j055595 · Cited by 435
Huynh, N. N. T., Garambois, P.-A., Renard, B., Colleoni, F., Monnier, J., & Roux, H. (2025) · Hydrology and Earth System Sciences · doi:10.5194/hess-29-3589-2025 · Cited by 38
Differentiable programming for Earth system modeling
Gelbrecht, M., White, A., Bathiany, S., & Boers, N. (2023) · Geoscientific Model Development · doi:10.5194/gmd-16-3123-2023 · Cited by 31
Metadata
- Authors
- Hascoet, L., & Pascual, V.
- Venue
- ACM Transactions on Mathematical Software
- Published
- 2013-04
- Volume
- 39
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 1-43
- ISSN
- 0098-3500 (ISSN-L)
- 1557-7295
- OpenAlex
- W2031070741
- Cited by
- 498
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 24.43
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The Tapenade automatic differentiation tool: Principles, model, and specification. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1145/2450153.2450158
- The paper
- Hascoet, L., & Pascual, V. (2013). The Tapenade automatic differentiation tool: Principles, model, and specification. ACM Transactions on Mathematical Software. https://doi.org/10.1145/2450153.2450158
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.