The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Analysis and characterization of inherent application resilience for approximate computing
Abstract
Approximate computing is an emerging design paradigm that enables highly efficient hardware and software implementations by exploiting the inherent resilience of applications to in-exactness in their computations. Previous work in this area has demonstrated the potential for significant energy and performance improvements, but largely consists of ad hoc techniques that have been applied to a small number of applications. Taking approximate computing closer to mainstream adoption requires (i) a deeper understanding of inherent application resilience across a broader range of applications (ii) tools that can quantitatively establish the inherent resilience of an application, and (iii) methods to quickly assess the potential of various approximate computing techniques for a given application. We make two key contributions in this direction. Our primary contribution is the analysis and characterization of inherent application resilience present in a suite of 12 widely used applications from the domains of recognition, data mining, and search. Based on this analysis, we present several new insights into the nature of resilience and its relationship to various key application characteristics. To facilitate our analysis, we propose a systematic framework for Application Resilience Characterization (ARC) that (a) partitions an application into resilient and sensitive parts and (b) characterizes the resilient parts using approximation models that abstract a wide range of approximate computing techniques. We believe that the key insights that we present can help shape further research in the area of approximate computing, while automatic resilience characterization frameworks such as ARC can greatly aid designers in the adoption approximate computing.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Approximate Multipliers Based on New Approximate Compressors
Esposito, D., Strollo, A. G. M., Napoli, E., De Caro, D., & Petra, N. (2018) · IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems I: Regular Papers · doi:10.1109/tcsi.2018.2839266 · Cited by 308
IoT technologies for embedded computing: a survey
Samie, F., Bauer, L., & Henkel, J. (2016) · Proceedings of the Eleventh IEEE/ACM/IFIP International Conference on Hardware/Software Codesign and System Synthesis · doi:10.1145/2968456.2974004 · Cited by 190
Efficiency in the serverless cloud paradigm: A survey on the reusing and approximation aspects
Denninnart, C., Chanikaphon, T., & Amini Salehi, M. (2023) · Software: Practice and Experience · doi:10.1002/spe.3233 · Cited by 15
Metadata
- Authors
- Chippa, V. K., Chakradhar, S. T., Roy, K., & Raghunathan, A.
- Venue
- Proceedings of the 50th Annual Design Automation Conference
- Publisher
- ACM
- Published
- 2013-05-29
- Pages
- 1-9
- ISSN
- 0738-100X (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2026005150
- Cited by
- 546
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 38.26
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Analysis and characterization of inherent application resilience for approximate computing. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1145/2463209.2488873
- The paper
- Chippa, V. K., Chakradhar, S. T., Roy, K., & Raghunathan, A. (2013). Analysis and characterization of inherent application resilience for approximate computing. Proceedings of the 50th Annual Design Automation Conference. https://doi.org/10.1145/2463209.2488873
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.