The DOI matches its Crossref record; 27 of the 27 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Trinity: a distributed graph engine on a memory cloud
Abstract
Computations performed by graph algorithms are data driven, and require a high degree of random data access. Despite the great progresses made in disk technology, it still cannot provide the level of efficient random access required by graph computation. On the other hand, memory-based approaches usually do not scale due to the capacity limit of single machines. In this paper, we introduce Trinity, a general purpose graph engine over a distributed memory cloud. Through optimized memory management and network communication, Trinity supports fast graph exploration as well as efficient parallel computing. In particular, Trinity leverages graph access patterns in both online and offline computation to optimize memory and communication for best performance. These enable Trinity to support efficient online query processing and offline analytics on large graphs with just a few commodity machines. Furthermore, Trinity provides a high level specification language called TSL for users to declare data schema and communication protocols, which brings great ease-of-use for general purpose graph management and computing. Our experiments show Trinity's performance in both low latency graph queries as well as high throughput graph analytics on web-scale, billion-node graphs.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
MapReduce: simplified data processing on large clusters
Dean, J., & Ghemawat, S. (2008) · Communications of the ACM · doi:10.1145/1327452.1327492 · Cited by 18,476
The Hadoop Distributed File System
Shvachko, K., Kuang, H., Radia, S., & Chansler, R. (2010) · 2010 IEEE 26th Symposium on Mass Storage Systems and Technologies (MSST) · doi:10.1109/msst.2010.5496972 · Cited by 4,834
(2010) · Cited by 4,411
(1992) · Lecture Notes in Computer Science · doi:10.1007/bfb0022433 · Cited by 3,955
Pregel: a system for large-scale graph processing
Malewicz, G., Austern, M. H., Bik, A. J. C., Dehnert, J. C., Horn, I., Leiser, N., & Czajkowski, G. (2010) · Proceedings of the 2010 ACM SIGMOD International Conference on Management of data · doi:10.1145/1807167.1807184 · Cited by 3,515
(1996) · Lecture Notes in Computer Science · doi:10.1007/3-540-61769-8 · Cited by 1,865
PowerGraph: distributed graph-parallel computation on natural graphs
Gonzalez, J. E., Low, Y., Gu, H., Bickson, D., & Guestrin, C. (2012) · doi:10.5555/2387880.2387883 · Cited by 1,451
LUBM: A benchmark for OWL knowledge base systems
Guo, Y., Pan, Z., & Heflin, J. (2005) · Journal of Web Semantics · doi:10.1016/j.websem.2005.06.005 · Cited by 1,354
R-MAT: A Recursive Model for Graph Mining
Chakrabarti, D., Zhan, Y., & Faloutsos, C. (2004) · Proceedings of the 2004 SIAM International Conference on Data Mining · doi:10.1137/1.9781611972740.43 · Cited by 1,255
GraphChi: Large-Scale Graph Computation on Just a PC
Kyrola, A., Blelloch, G. E., & Guestrin, C. (2018) · Figshare · doi:10.1184/r1/6605999 · Cited by 868
Cited by
McCune, R. R., Weninger, T., & Madey, G. (2015) · ACM Computing Surveys · doi:10.1145/2818185 · Cited by 294
Shaukat, U., Ahmed, E., Anwar, Z., & Xia, F. (2016) · Journal of Network and Computer Applications · doi:10.1016/j.jnca.2015.11.009 · Cited by 140
Metadata
- Authors
- Shao, B., Wang, H., & Li, Y.
- Venue
- Proceedings of the 2013 ACM SIGMOD International Conference on Management of Data
- Publisher
- ACM
- Published
- 2013-06-22
- Pages
- 505-516
- ISSN
- 0730-8078 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2160459668
- Cited by
- 432
- References
- 27
- FWCI
- 44.59
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Trinity: a distributed graph engine on a memory cloud. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1145/2463676.2467799
- The paper
- Shao, B., Wang, H., & Li, Y. (2013). Trinity: a distributed graph engine on a memory cloud. Proceedings of the 2013 ACM SIGMOD International Conference on Management of Data. https://doi.org/10.1145/2463676.2467799
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.