Cited by 18

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Glinda: a framework for accelerating imbalanced applications on heterogeneous platforms

Shen, Jie, Varbanescu, Ana Lucia, Sips, Henk, Arntzen, Michael, Simons, Dick G.·2013·Proceedings of the ACM International Conference on Computing Frontiers

Abstract

Heterogeneous platforms integrating different processors like GPUs and multi-core CPUs become popular in high performance computing. While most applications are currently using the homogeneous parts of these platforms, we argue that there is a large class of applications that can benefit from their heterogeneity: massively parallel imbalanced applications. Such applications emerge, for example, from variable time step based numerical methods and simulations. In this paper, we present Glinda, a framework for accelerating imbalanced applications on heterogeneous computing platforms. Our framework is able to correctly detect the application workload characteristics, make choices based on the available parallel solutions and hardware configuration, and automatically obtain the optimal workload decomposition and distribution. Our experiments on parallelizing a heavily imbalanced acoustic ray tracing application show that Glinda improves application performance in multiple scenarios, achieving up to 12x speedup against manually configured parallel solutions.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1145/2482767.2482785

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Different phases of a single application may exhibit properties which make it more suitable for execution on a particular PU.

    “Not only different applications, but even different phases of a single application may exhibit properties which make it more suitable for execution on a particular PU [He and Hong 2010;Nere et al. 2012;Shen et al. 2013]).”

    From A Survey of CPU-GPU Heterogeneous Computing Techniques (2015) · cites this paper as Shen et al. 2013

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 22

  1. 10.2514/6.2012-2079 · DOI
  2. 10.1002/cpe.1631 · DOI
  3. 10.1145/1383422.1383447 · DOI
  4. 10.1145/2370816.2370866 · DOI
  5. 10.5555/1987237.1987259 · DOI
  6. 10.1145/1854273.1854302 · DOI · Paper page
  7. 10.1109/IPDPS.2009.5160977 · DOI
  8. 10.5555/1885276.1885302 · DOI
  9. 10.1109/PACT.2011.14 · DOI
  10. 10.1007/978-3-540-92990-1_4 · DOI
  11. Joselli M., 2012, Mendonca. Techniques for Designing GPGPU Games. In Proceedings of the IEEE International Games Innovation Conference, 1
  12. 10.1145/1346281.1346318 · DOI
  13. 10.1145/1669112.1669121 · DOI
  14. 10.1109/JPROC.2008.917757 · DOI
  15. 10.1016/j.cma.2011.01.013 · DOI
  16. 10.1109/TPDS.2010.115 · DOI
  17. 10.2514/6.2005-2983 · DOI
  18. 10.1007/978-94-010-0660-6 · DOI
  19. 10.1109/ICPPW.2012.18 · DOI
  20. 10.1016/j.parco.2009.12.005 · DOI
  21. 10.1145/1542275.1542312 · DOI
  22. 10.1109/TPDS.2010.125 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Shen, J., Varbanescu, A. L., Sips, H., Arntzen, M., & Simons, D. G.
Affiliations
Delft University of Technology, The Netherlands
Venue
Proceedings of the ACM International Conference on Computing Frontiers
Publisher
ACM
Published
2013-05-14
Pages
1-10
Cited by
18
References
0
Funders
China Scholarship Council

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review