The DOI matches its Crossref record; 44 of the 47 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Spotting opinion spammers using behavioral footprints
Abstract
Opinionated social media such as product reviews are now widely used by individuals and organizations for their decision making. However, due to the reason of profit or fame, people try to game the system by opinion spamming (e.g., writing fake reviews) to promote or to demote some target products. In recent years, fake review detection has attracted significant attention from both the business and research communities. However, due to the difficulty of human labeling needed for supervised learning and evaluation, the problem remains to be highly challenging. This work proposes a novel angle to the problem by modeling spamicity as latent. An unsupervised model, called Author Spamicity Model (ASM), is proposed. It works in the Bayesian setting, which facilitates modeling spamicity of authors as latent and allows us to exploit various observed behavioral footprints of reviewers. The intuition is that opinion spammers have different behavioral distributions than non-spammers. This creates a distributional divergence between the latent population distributions of two clusters: spammers and non-spammers. Model inference results in learning the population distributions of the two clusters. Several extensions of ASM are also considered leveraging from different priors. Experiments on a real-life Amazon review dataset demonstrate the effectiveness of the proposed models which significantly outperform the state-of-the-art competitors.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“We found ASO workers who post fake reviews in rapid bursts in both our qualitative and quantitative investigations.This is consistent with assumptions made in previous fraud detection work, e.g., [26, 28, 32, 36-38, 40, 42, 43, 51, 52, 59-61, 63, 65, 92, 95, 96, 100].”
From The Art and Craft of Fraudulent App Promotion in Google Play (2019) · cites this paper as [36]
In the citing paper
“These results confirm DDA's outcome and previous work on crowdsourced review manipulation, e.g., [36].”
From Fraud De-Anonymization for Fun and Profit (2018) · cites this paper as [36]
Citations
Cites
The Measurement of Observer Agreement for Categorical Data
Landis, J. R., & Koch, G. G. (1977) · Biometrics · doi:10.2307/2529310 · Cited by 81,148
Book Review: Pattern Recognition and Machine Learning
Nasrabadi, N. M. (2007) · Journal of Electronic Imaging · doi:10.1117/1.2819119 · Cited by 22,066
Measuring nominal scale agreement among many raters.
Fleiss, J. L. (1971) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/h0031619 · Cited by 8,733
Text categorization with Support Vector Machines: Learning with many relevant features
Joachims, T. (1998) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/bfb0026683 · Cited by 8,271
(2006) · Springer eBooks · Cited by 8,123
Optimizing search engines using clickthrough data
Joachims, T. (2002) · ACM SIGKDD Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining (KDD) · doi:10.1145/775047.775067 · Cited by 3,947
Zhu, C., Byrd, R. H., Lu, P., & Nocedal, J. M. (1997) · ACM Transactions on Mathematical Software · doi:10.1145/279232.279236 · Cited by 3,474
Multi-Interval Discretization of Continuous-Valued Attributes for Classification Learning
Fayyad, U. M., & Irani, K. B. (1993) · International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence · Cited by 2,870
Learning to rank for information retrieval
Liu, T. (2010) · International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval (SIGIR) · doi:10.1145/1835449.1835676 · Cited by 1,929
Supervised Topic ModelsPreprint
Blei, D., & McAuliffe, J. D. (2007) · Neural Information Processing Systems · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1003.0783 · Cited by 1,860
Flagged first, then by citations
3 of the 47 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.
Research works printed but not linked: 6
- Duda R. O. Hart P. E. and Stork D.J. 2001. Pattern Recognition. Wiley. Duda R. O. Hart P. E. and Stork D.J. 2001. Pattern Recognition. Wiley.
- 10.5555/2283696.2283811 · DOI
- Ramage , D. , Hall , D. , Nallapati , R. , & Manning , C.D. 2009. A supervised topic model for credit attribution in multi-labeled corpora. EMNLP ( 2009 ). Ramage, D., Hall, D., Nallapati, R., & Manning, C.D. 2009. A supervised topic model for credit attribution in multi-labeled corpora. EMNLP (2009).
- Streitfeld , D. 2012. Buy Reviews on Yelp , Get Black Mark. ( 2012 ). Streitfeld, D. 2012. Buy Reviews on Yelp, Get Black Mark. (2012).
- 10.5555/1814490.1814493 · DOI
- 10.5555/945365.964285 · DOI
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 101–200 of 424
Detecting fake reviews with supervised machine learning algorithms
Lee, M., Song, Y. H., Li, L., Lee, K. Y., & Yang, S. (2022) · Service Industries Journal · doi:10.1080/02642069.2022.2054996 · Cited by 40
Identification of fake reviews using semantic and behavioral features
Wang, X., Zhang, X., Jiang, C., & Liu, H. (2018) · International Conference on Information Management · doi:10.1109/infoman.2018.8392816 · Cited by 35
A Framework for Fake Review Detection: Issues and Challenges
Rout, J. K., Dash, A. K., & Ray, N. K. (2018) · doi:10.1109/icit.2018.00014 · Cited by 34
Detecting collusive spammers with heterogeneous graph attention network
Zhang, F., Wu, J., Zhang, P., Ma, R., & Yu, H. (2023) · Information Processing & Management · doi:10.1016/j.ipm.2023.103282 · Cited by 34
Detecting Deceptive Review Spam via Attention-Based Neural Networks
Wang, X., Liu, K., & Zhao, J. (2018) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-73618-1_76 · Cited by 34
360 degree view of cross-domain opinion classification: a survey
Singh, R. K., Sachan, M. K., & Patel, R. B. (2020) · Artificial Intelligence Review · doi:10.1007/s10462-020-09884-9 · Cited by 35
SC-Com: Spotting Collusive Community in Opinion Spam Detection
Byun, H., Jeong, S., & Kim, C.-K. (2021) · Information Processing & Management · doi:10.1016/j.ipm.2021.102593 · Cited by 34
Discovering shilling groups in a real e-commerce platform
Wang, Y., Wu, Z., Bu, Z., Cao, J., & Yang, D. (2016) · Online Information Review · doi:10.1108/oir-03-2015-0073 · Cited by 34
Learning Document Representation for Deceptive Opinion Spam Detection
Li, L., Ren, W., Qin, B., & Liu, T. (2015) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-25816-4_32 · Cited by 32
Yu, C., Zuo, Y., Feng, B., An, L., & Chen, B. (2018) · Information Technology and Management · doi:10.1007/s10799-018-0288-1 · Cited by 33
Temporal burstiness and collaborative camouflage aware fraud detection
Zhang, Z., Wan, J., Zhou, M., Lai, Z., Tessone, C. J., Chen, G., & Liao, H. (2022) · Information Processing & Management · doi:10.1016/j.ipm.2022.103170 · Cited by 33
Minnich, A., Chavoshi, N., Mueen, A., Luan, S., & Faloutsos, M. (2015) · International World Wide Web Conference (WWW) · doi:10.1145/2736277.2741655 · Cited by 30
Sentiment and emotion classification over noisy labels
Wang, Y., Rao, Y., Zhan, X., Chen, H., Luo, M., & Yin, J. P. (2016) · Knowledge-Based Systems · doi:10.1016/j.knosys.2016.08.012 · Cited by 33
A CNN-based misleading video detection model
Li, X., Xiao, X., Li, J., Hu, C., Yao, J., & Li, S. (2022) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-022-10117-y · Cited by 33
Deceptive opinion spam detection approaches: a literature survey
Maurya, S. K., Singh, D., & Maurya, A. K. (2022) · Applied Intelligence · doi:10.1007/s10489-022-03427-1 · Cited by 36
RHGNN: Fake reviewer detection based on reinforced heterogeneous graph neural networks
Zhao, J., Shao, M., Tang, H., Liu, J., Du, L., & Wang, H. (2023) · Knowledge-Based Systems · doi:10.1016/j.knosys.2023.111029 · Cited by 34
Fake review detection techniques, issues, and future research directions: a literature review
Duma, R. A., Niu, Z., Nyamawe, A. S., Tchaye-Kondi, J., Jingili, N., Yusuf, A. A., & Deve, A. F. (2024) · Knowledge and Information Systems · doi:10.1007/s10115-024-02118-2 · Cited by 40
Fake Review Detection via Exploitation of Spam Indicators and Reviewer Behavior Characteristics
Dematis, I., Karapistoli, E., & Vakali, A. I. (2017) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-73117-9_41 · Cited by 32
Network-based Fake News Detection: A Pattern-driven ApproachPreprint
Zhou, X., & Zafarani, R. (2019) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1906.04210 · Cited by 33
Spam Review Detection Using Ensemble Machine Learning
Mani, S., Kumari, S., Jain, A., & Kumar, P. (2018) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-96133-0_15 · Cited by 30
A Supervised Machine Learning Approach for the Credibility Assessment of User-Generated Content
Jain, P. K., Pamula, R., & Ansari, S. (2021) · Wireless Personal Communications · doi:10.1007/s11277-021-08136-5 · Cited by 29
Detection of Fake Reviews: Analysis of Sellers’ Manipulation Behavior
Chen, L., Li, W., Chen, H., & Geng, S. (2019) · Sustainability · doi:10.3390/su11174802 · Cited by 30
Collusion-aware detection of review spammers in location based social networks
Cao, J., Xia, R., Guo, Y., & Ma, Z. (2018) · World Wide Web · doi:10.1007/s11280-018-0614-x · Cited by 30
Cheng, L., Hu, H.-W., & Wu, C. (2021) · Journal of Global Information Management · doi:10.4018/jgim.2021030104 · Cited by 29
Trust-Aware Review Spam Detection
Xue, H., Li, F., Seo, H., & Pluretti, R. (2015) · IEEE International Conference on Trust, Security and Privacy in Computing and Communications (TrustCom) · doi:10.1109/trustcom.2015.440 · Cited by 29
Gasparetti, F. (2016) · Pervasive and Mobile Computing · doi:10.1016/j.pmcj.2016.04.004 · Cited by 26
Cocarascu, O., & Toni, F. (2018) · Computational Linguistics · doi:10.1162/coli_a_00338 · Cited by 25
A deceptive reviews detection model: Separated training of multi-feature learning and classification
Cao, N., Ji, S., Chiu, D. K. W., & Gong, M. (2021) · Expert Systems with Applications · doi:10.1016/j.eswa.2021.115977 · Cited by 30
A comprehensive survey of various methods in opinion spam detection
Mewada, A., & Dewang, R. K. (2022) · Multimedia Tools and Applications · doi:10.1007/s11042-022-13702-5 · Cited by 32
Spotting review spammer groups: A cosine pattern and network based method
Zhang, L., He, G., Cao, J., Zhu, H., & Xu, B. (2018) · Concurrency and Computation Practice and Experience · doi:10.1002/cpe.4686 · Cited by 26
Detecting Fake Online Reviews: An Unsupervised Detection Method With a Novel Performance Evaluation
Pan, Y., & Xu, L. (2024) · International Journal of Electronic Commerce · doi:10.1080/10864415.2023.2295067 · Cited by 30
The Art and Craft of Fraudulent App Promotion in Google Play
Rahman, M., Hernandez, N., Recabarren, R., Ahmed, S. I., & Carbunar, B. (2019) · Proceedings of the 2019 ACM SIGSAC Conference on Computer and Communications Security · doi:10.1145/3319535.3345658 · Cited by 25
To catch a fake: Curbing deceptive Yelp ratings and venues
Rahman, M., Cărbunar, B., Ballesteros, J., & Chau, D. H. (2015) · Statistical Analysis and Data Mining The ASA Data Science Journal · doi:10.1002/sam.11264 · Cited by 26
Semi-Supervised Learning Based Fake Review Detection
Deng, H., Zhao, L., Luo, N., Liu, Y., Guo, G., Wang, X., Tan, Z., Wang, S., & Zhou, F. (2017) · IEEE International Symposium on Parallel and Distributed Processing with Applications (ISPA) · doi:10.1109/ispa/iucc.2017.00195 · Cited by 24
Detecting and Characterizing Extremist Reviewer Groups in Online Product Reviews
Gupta, V., Aggarwal, A., & Chakraborty, T. (2020) · IEEE Transactions on Computational Social Systems · doi:10.1109/tcss.2020.2988098 · Cited by 26
Turning the Tide: Curbing Deceptive Yelp Behaviors
Rahman, M., Cărbunar, B., Ballesteros, J., Burri, G. J., & Chau, D. H. (2014) · SIAM International Conference on Data Mining · doi:10.1137/1.9781611973440.28 · Cited by 24
Product review management software based on multiple classifiers
Catal, C., & Guldan, S. (2017) · IET Software · doi:10.1049/iet-sen.2016.0137 · Cited by 23
Content-Aware Trust Propagation Toward Online Review Spam Detection
Xue, H., Wang, Q., Luo, B., Seo, H., & Li, F. (2019) · Journal of Data and Information Quality · doi:10.1145/3305258 · Cited by 24
Detecting deceptive reviews using Argumentation
Cocarascu, O., & Toni, F. (2016) · doi:10.1145/2970030.2970031 · Cited by 24
Spam Detection in Reviews Using LSTM-Based Multi-Entity Temporal Features
Xiang, L., Guo, G., Li, Q., Zhu, C., Chen, J., & Ma, H. (2020) · Intelligent Automation & Soft Computing · doi:10.32604/iasc.2020.013382 · Cited by 23
Learning user credibility for product ranking
Zhang, R., Gao, M. Z., He, X., & Zhou, A. (2015) · Knowledge and Information Systems · doi:10.1007/s10115-015-0880-1 · Cited by 23
Effective Opinion Spam Detection: A Study on Review Metadata Versus Content
Rastogi, A., Mehrotra, M., & Ali, S. S. (2020) · Journal of Data and Information Science · doi:10.2478/jdis-2020-0013 · Cited by 24
Opinion Spam Detection Based on Heterogeneous Information Network
Sun, Y., & Loparo, K. A. (2019) · IEEE International Conference on Tools with Artificial Intelligence (ICTAI) · doi:10.1109/ictai.2019.00277 · Cited by 21
Detecting Collusive Spamming Activities in Community Question Answering
Liu, Y., Liu, Y., Zhou, K., Zhang, M., & Ma, S. (2017) · International World Wide Web Conference (WWW) · doi:10.1145/3038912.3052594 · Cited by 21
Heterogeneous anomaly detection in social diffusion with discriminative feature discovery
Liu, S., Qu, Q., & Wang, S. (2018) · Information Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.ins.2018.01.044 · Cited by 21
A Spammer Identification Method for Class Imbalanced Weibo Datasets
Tang, W., Ding, Z., & Zhou, M. (2019) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2019.2901756 · Cited by 21
Goodreads Versus Amazon: The Effect of Decoupling Book Reviewing And Book Selling
Dimitrov, S., Zamal, F. A., Piper, A., & Ruths, D. A. (2021) · Proceedings of the International AAAI Conference on Web and Social Media · doi:10.1609/icwsm.v9i1.14662 · Cited by 21
Detecting opinion spam and fake news using n-gram analysis and semantic similarity
Ahmed, H. (2017) · UVic’s Research and Learning Repository (University of Victoria) · Cited by 21
Sentiment and Emotion Based Text Representation for Fake Reviews Detection
Melleng, A., Loughrey, A.-J., & Deepak, P. (2019) · International conference Recent advances in natural language processing · doi:10.26615/978-954-452-056-4_087 · Cited by 22
Leveraging multi-level dependency of relational sequences for social spammer detection
Yin, J., Li, Q., Liu, S., Wu, Z., & Xu, G. (2020) · Neurocomputing · doi:10.1016/j.neucom.2020.10.070 · Cited by 20
A comparison of hotel ratings between verified and non-verified online review platforms
Figini, P., Vici, L., & Viglia, G. (2020) · International Journal of Culture Tourism and Hospitality Research · doi:10.1108/ijcthr-10-2019-0193 · Cited by 20
Harnessing the Power of the General Public for Crowdsourced Business Intelligence: A Survey
Guo, B., Liu, Y., Ouyang, Y., Zheng, V. W., Zhang, D., & Yu, Z. (2019) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2019.2901027 · Cited by 19
Serra, E., Shrestha, A., Spezzano, F., & Squicciarini, A. (2020) · ACM Conference on Data and Application Security and Privacy (CODASPY) · doi:10.1145/3374664.3375744 · Cited by 20
Detection of Fake Reviews Using Group Model
Li, Y., Wang, F., Zhang, S., & Niu, X. (2020) · Mobile Networks and Applications · doi:10.1007/s11036-020-01688-z · Cited by 20
Adaptive big data analytics for deceptive review detection in online social media
Zhang, W., Lau, R. Y. K., & Li, C. (2014) · Journal of the Association for Information Systems · Cited by 19
A Survey On Spam URLs Detection In Twitter
Daffa, W., Bamasag, O. O., & AlMansour, A. A. (2018) · International Conference on Computer Applications & Information Security (ICCAIS) · doi:10.1109/cais.2018.8441975 · Cited by 17
Detecting review spammer groups based on generative adversarial networks
Zhang, F., Yuan, S., Zhang, P., Chao, J., & Yu, H. (2022) · Information Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.ins.2022.05.086 · Cited by 18
Nilizadeh, S., Aghakhani, H., Gustafson, E., Kruegel, C., & Vigna, G. (2019) · International World Wide Web Conference (WWW) · doi:10.1145/3308558.3313647 · Cited by 18
Reliable Recommendation with Review-level Explanations
Lyu, Y., Yin, H., Liu, J., Liu, M., Liu, H., & Deng, S. (2021) · IEEE International Conference on Data Engineering (ICDE) · doi:10.1109/icde51399.2021.00137 · Cited by 17
Zhang, F., Yuan, S., Wu, J., Zhang, P., & Chao, J. (2022) · Expert Systems with Applications · doi:10.1016/j.eswa.2022.117482 · Cited by 17
Exploring Latent Semantic Factors to Find Useful Product Reviews
Mukherjee, S., Popat, K., & Weikum, G. (2017) · Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics eBooks · doi:10.1137/1.9781611974973.54 · Cited by 17
Value and Misinformation in Collaborative Investing Platforms
Wang, T., Wang, G., Wang, B., Sambasivan, D., Zhang, Z., Li, X., Zheng, H.-T., & Zhao, B. Y. (2017) · ACM Transactions on the Web · doi:10.1145/3027487 · Cited by 18
Unsupervised User Behavior Representation for Fraud Review Detection with Cold-Start Problem
Li, Q., Wu, Q., Zhu, C., Zhang, J., & Zhao, W. (2019) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-16148-4_18 · Cited by 17
Identifying ground truth in opinion spam: an empirical survey based on review psychology
Li, J., Wang, X., Yang, L., Zhang, P., & Yang, D. (2020) · Applied Intelligence · doi:10.1007/s10489-020-01764-7 · Cited by 18
Detecting Deceptive Opinion Spam using Linguistics, Behavioral and Statistical Modeling
Mukherjee, A. (2015) · doi:10.3115/v1/p15-5007 · Cited by 17
Self-citationSecure and smart autonomous multi-robot systems for opinion spammer detection
Xu, G., Hu, M., & Ma, C. (2021) · Information Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.ins.2021.07.072 · Cited by 16
Predicting Credibility of Online Reviews: An Integrated Approach
Abedin, E., Mendoza, A., Akbarighatar, P., & Karunasekera, S. A. (2024) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2024.3383846 · Cited by 18
Credible Review Detection with Limited Information Using Consistency Features
Mukherjee, S., Dutta, S., & Weikum, G. (2016) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-46227-1_13 · Cited by 17
Fake opinion detection: how similar are crowdsourced datasets to real data?
Fornaciari, T., Cagnina, L., Rosso, P., & Poesio, M. (2020) · Language Resources and Evaluation · doi:10.1007/s10579-020-09486-5 · Cited by 17
IFSpard: An Information Fusion-based Framework for Spam Review Detection
Zhu, Y., Liu, H., Du, Y., & Wu, Z. (2021) · International World Wide Web Conference (WWW) · doi:10.1145/3442381.3449920 · Cited by 16
Le, T.-K.-H., Li, Y., & Li, S.-T. (2022) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2022.3167511 · Cited by 18
Multi-Aspect Feature Based Neural Network Model in Detecting Fake Reviews
Luo, N., Deng, H., Zhao, L., Liu, Y., Wang, X., & Tan, Z. (2017) · International Conference on Information Science and Control Engineering · doi:10.1109/icisce.2017.106 · Cited by 16
FairJudge: Trustworthy User Prediction in Rating PlatformsPreprint
Kumar, S., Hooi, B., Makhija, D., Kumar, M., Faloutsos, C., & Subrahamanian, V. S. (2017) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1703.10545 · Cited by 16
Fraud De-Anonymization for Fun and Profit
Hernandez, N., Rahman, M., Recabarren, R., & Carbunar, B. (2018) · Proceedings of the 2018 ACM SIGSAC Conference on Computer and Communications Security · doi:10.1145/3243734.3243770 · Cited by 16
Trust-Aware Review Spam Detection
Xue, H., Li, F., Seo, H., & Pluretti, R. (2015) · doi:10.1109/trustcom-bigdatase-ispa.2015.440 · Cited by 16
Collusive Opinion Fraud Detection in Online Reviews
Xu, C., & Zhang, J. (2017) · ACM Transactions on the Web · doi:10.1145/3098859 · Cited by 16
Intent Mining for the Good, Bad, and Ugly Use of Social Web: Concepts, Methods, and Challenges
Purohit, H., & Pandey, R. (2018) · Lecture notes in social networks · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-94105-9_1 · Cited by 15
From Symbols to Embeddings: A Tale of Two Representations in Computational Social Science
Chen, H., Yang, C. H., Zhang, X., Liu, Z., Sun, M., & Jin, J. (2021) · Journal of Social Computing · doi:10.23919/jsc.2021.0011 · Cited by 19
MUSH: Multi-Stimuli Hawkes Process Based Sybil Attacker Detector for User-Review Social Networks
Qu, Z., Lyu, C., & Chi, C. (2022) · IEEE Transactions on Network and Service Management · doi:10.1109/tnsm.2022.3186513 · Cited by 15
The impact of monetary rewards for online reviews
Duan, Y., Chen, C., & Huo, J. (2019) · Asia Pacific Journal of Marketing and Logistics · doi:10.1108/apjml-02-2018-0082 · Cited by 15
Zhang, Q., Liang, Z., Ji, S., Xing, B., & Chiu, D. K. W. (2023) · Cybersecurity · doi:10.1186/s42400-023-00159-8 · Cited by 16
A deceptive detection model based on topic, sentiment, and sentence structure information
Du, X., Zhu, R., Zhao, F., Zhao, F., Han, P., & Zhu, Z. (2020) · Applied Intelligence · doi:10.1007/s10489-020-01779-0 · Cited by 14
Opinion Spam Detection: A New Approach Using Machine Learning and Network-Based Algorithms
Danilchenko, K., Segal, M., & Vilenchik, D. (2022) · Proceedings of the International AAAI Conference on Web and Social Media · doi:10.1609/icwsm.v16i1.19278 · Cited by 17
Duma, R. A., Niu, Z., Nyamawe, A. S., Tchaye-Kondi, J., Chambua, J., & Yusuf, A. A. (2023) · Multimedia Tools and Applications · doi:10.1007/s11042-023-15193-4 · Cited by 13
Detecting singleton spams in reviews via learning deep anomalous temporal aspect-sentiment patterns
Shaalan, Y., Zhang, X., Chan, J., & Salehi, M. (2021) · Data Mining and Knowledge Discovery · doi:10.1007/s10618-020-00725-5 · Cited by 13
Detecting Product Review Spammers Using Principles of Big Data
Rout, J. K., Dalmia, A., Rath, S. K., Mohanta, B. K., Ramasubbareddy, S., & Gandomi, A. H. (2021) · IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management · doi:10.1109/tem.2021.3097805 · Cited by 13
Metapath and syntax-aware heterogeneous subgraph neural networks for spam review detection
Zhang, Z., Dong, Y., Wu, H., Song, H., Deng, S., & Chen, Y. (2022) · Applied Soft Computing · doi:10.1016/j.asoc.2022.109438 · Cited by 13
Blackmarket-Driven Collusion on Online Media: A Survey
Dutta, H. S., & Chakraborty, T. (2021) · ACM/IMS Transactions on Data Science · doi:10.1145/3517931 · Cited by 15
Fake Reviewer Group Detection in Online Review Systems
Cao, C., Li, S., Yu, S., & Chen, Z. (2021) · IEEE ... International Conference on Data Mining workshops · doi:10.1109/icdmw53433.2021.00122 · Cited by 15
An Empirical Analysis of Different Techniques for Spam Detection
Rangari, K., & Khan, A. (2022) · International Conference on Advanced Computing and Communication Systems (ICACCS) · doi:10.1109/icaccs54159.2022.9785177 · Cited by 12
A new web personalization decision-support artifact for utility-sensitive customer review analysis
Flory, L., Osei-Bryson, K.-M., & Thomas, M. A. (2016) · Decision Support Systems · doi:10.1016/j.dss.2016.11.003 · Cited by 13
An Empirical Investigation of Ecommerce-Reputation-Escalation-as-a-Service
Xu, H., Liu, D., Wang, H., & Stavrou, A. (2017) · ACM Transactions on the Web · doi:10.1145/2983646 · Cited by 12
Overview of Web Spammer Detection
Mo, Q., & Yang, K. (2014) · Cited by 12
Detecting review spammer groups in dynamic review networks
Hu, M., Xu, G., Ma, C., & Daneshmand, M. (2019) · ACM Turing Celebration Conference - China (ACM TURC) · doi:10.1145/3321408.3323077 · Cited by 11
Certification and Trade-off of Multiple Fairness Criteria in Graph-based Spam Detection
Burkholder, K., Kwock, K., Xu, Y., Liu, J., Chen, C., & Xie, S. (2021) · ACM International Conference on Information and Knowledge Management (CIKM) · doi:10.1145/3459637.3482325 · Cited by 11
Evaluation of Data Mining Features, Features Taxonomies and their Applications
Noekhah, S., Salim, N. B., & Zakaria, N. H. (2017) · Kurdistan Journal of Applied Research · doi:10.24017/science.2017.3.3 · Cited by 11
Opinion Spam Recognition Method for Online Reviews using Ontological Features
Long, N. H., Nghia, P. H. T., & Vuong, N. M. (2018) · Tạp chí Khoa học · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1807.11024 · Cited by 13
Mining Weak Relations Between Reviews for Opinion Spam Detection
Xu, Y., Liu, H., Ge, J., Zhang, X., Hu, J., Wu, Y., Lv, H., Shi, H., & Zhou, W. J. (2022) · IEEE/ACM Transactions on Audio Speech and Language Processing · doi:10.1109/taslp.2022.3221008 · Cited by 10
Deceptive opinion spam detection using feature reduction techniques
Maurya, S. K., Singh, D., & Maurya, A. K. (2023) · International Journal of Systems Assurance Engineering and Management · doi:10.1007/s13198-023-02208-4 · Cited by 10
Leveraging Stacking Framework for Fake Review Detection in the Hospitality Sector
Ashraf, S. A., Javed, A. F., Bellary, S., Bala, P. K., & Panigrahi, P. K. (2024) · Journal of theoretical and applied electronic commerce research · doi:10.3390/jtaer19020075 · Cited by 12
Metadata
- Authors
- Mukherjee, A., Kumar, A., Liu, B., Wang, J., Hsu, M., Castellanos, M., & Ghosh, R.
- Affiliations
- University of Illinois Chicago (US)
- Hewlett-Packard (United States) (US)
- HP Labs, Palo Alto, CA, USA
- Venue
- Proceedings of the 19th ACM SIGKDD international conference on Knowledge discovery and data mining
- Publisher
- ACM
- Published
- 2013-08-11
- Pages
- 632-640
- OpenAlex
- W2016266039
- Cited by
- 426
- References
- 47
- Citations by year
- 2026: 3 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 13 · 2023: 21 · 2022: 37 · 2021: 37 · 2020: 61 · 2019: 47 · 2018: 55 · 2017: 47 · 2016: 35 · 2015: 40 · 2014: 17 · 2013: 1
- FWCI
- 24.84
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- ACM SIGKDD Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining (KDD) (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- National Science Foundation
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Spam and Phishing Detection
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Misinformation and Its Impacts
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Hate Speech and Cyberbullying Detection
- Keywords
- fake review detection, Bayesian clustering, reviewer behavior, Amazon reviews
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
