The DOI matches its Crossref record.
U-Air: when urban air quality inference meets big data
Abstract
Information about urban air quality, e.g., the concentration of PM2.5, is of great importance to protect human health and control air pollution. While there are limited air-quality-monitor-stations in a city, air quality varies in urban spaces non-linearly and depends on multiple factors, such as meteorology, traffic volume, and land uses. In this paper, we infer the real-time and fine-grained air quality information throughout a city, based on the (historical and real-time) air quality data reported by existing monitor stations and a variety of data sources we observed in the city, such as meteorology, traffic flow, human mobility, structure of road networks, and point of interests (POIs). We propose a semi-supervised learning approach based on a co-training framework that consists of two separated classifiers. One is a spatial classifier based on an artificial neural network (ANN), which takes spatially-related features (e.g., the density of POIs and length of highways) as input to model the spatial correlation between air qualities of different locations. The other is a temporal classifier based on a linear-chain conditional random field (CRF), involving temporally-related features (e.g., traffic and meteorology) to model the temporal dependency of air quality in a location. We evaluated our approach with extensive experiments based on five real data sources obtained in Beijing and Shanghai. The results show the advantages of our method over four categories of baselines, including linear/Gaussian interpolations, classical dispersion models, well-known classification models like decision tree and CRF, and ANN.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Fadlullah, Z. M., Tang, F., Mao, B., Kato, N., Akashi, O., Inoue, T., & Mizutani, K. (2017) · IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials · doi:10.1109/comst.2017.2707140 · Cited by 810
Bibri, S. E. (2018) · Sustainable Cities and Society · doi:10.1016/j.scs.2017.12.034 · Cited by 799
Methodologies for Cross-Domain Data Fusion: An Overview
Zheng, Y. (2015) · IEEE Transactions on Big Data · doi:10.1109/tbdata.2015.2465959 · Cited by 454
Self-citationBig data meet green challenges: big data toward green applications
Wu, J., Guo, S., Li, J., & Zeng, D. (2016) · IEEE Systems Journal · doi:10.1109/jsyst.2016.2550530 · Cited by 389
Federated Learning in the Sky: Aerial-Ground Air Quality Sensing Framework with UAV Swarms
Liu, Y., Nie, J., Li, X., Ahmed, S. H., Lim, W. Y. B., & Miao, C. (2020) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2007.12004 · Cited by 227
Bibri, S. E., & Krogstie, J. (2017) · Sustainable Cities and Society · doi:10.1016/j.scs.2017.04.012 · Cited by 167
Visual analytics in urban computing: An overview
Zheng, Y., Wu, W., Chen, Y., Qu, H., & Ni, L. M. (2016) · IEEE Transactions on Big Data · doi:10.1109/tbdata.2016.2586447 · Cited by 141
Self-citationFederated Region-Learning: An Edge Computing Based Framework for Urban Environment Sensing
Hu, B., Gao, Y., Liu, L., & Ma, H. (2018) · 2018 IEEE Global Communications Conference (GLOBECOM) · doi:10.1109/glocom.2018.8647649 · Cited by 67
Metadata
- Authors
- Zheng, Y., Liu, F., & Hsieh, H.-P.
- Venue
- Proceedings of the 19th ACM SIGKDD international conference on Knowledge discovery and data mining
- Publisher
- ACM
- Published
- 2013-08-11
- Pages
- 1436-1444
- OpenAlex
- W1971402834
- Cited by
- 916
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 173.50
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.