The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
KONECT: the Koblenz network collection
Abstract
We present the Koblenz Network Collection (KONECT), a project to collect network datasets in the areas of web science, network science and related areas, as well as provide tools for their analysis. In the cited areas, a surprisingly large number of very heterogeneous data can be modeled as networks and consequently, a unified representation of networks can be used to gain insight into many kinds of problems. Due to the emergence of the World Wide Web in the last decades many such datasets are now openly available. The KONECT project thus has the goal of collecting many diverse network datasets from the Web, and providing a way for their systematic study. The main parts of KONECT are (1) a collection of over 160 network datasets, consisting of directed, undirected, unipartite, bipartite, weighted, unweighted, signed and temporal networks collected from the Web, (2) a Matlab toolbox for network analysis and (3) a website giving a compact overview the various computed statistics and plots. In this paper, we describe KONECT's taxonomy of networks datasets, give an overview of the datasets included, review the supported statistics and plots, and briefly discuss KONECT's role in the area of web science and network science.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Emergence of Scaling in Random Networks
Barabási, A.-L., & Albert, R. (1999) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.286.5439.509 · Cited by 36,135
Cited by
Representation learning for dynamic graphs: A survey
Kazemi, S. M., Goel, R., Jain, K., Kobyzev, I., Sethi, A., Forsyth, P., & Poupart, P. (2019) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1905.11485 · Cited by 338
REGAL: Representation Learning-based Graph Alignment
Heimann, M., Shen, H., Safavi, T., & Koutra, D. (2018) · Proceedings of the 27th ACM International Conference on Information and Knowledge Management · doi:10.1145/3269206.3271788 · Cited by 257
Quantification of network structural dissimilarities
Schieber, T. A., Carpi, L., Díaz-Guilera, A., Pardalos, P. M., Masoller, C., & Ravetti, M. G. (2017) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/ncomms13928 · Cited by 237
Multilevel Combinatorial Optimization across Quantum Architectures
Ushijima-Mwesigwa, H., Shaydulin, R., Negre, C. F. A., Mniszewski, S. M., Alexeev, Y., & Safro, I. (2021) · ACM Transactions on Quantum Computing · doi:10.1145/3425607 · Cited by 57
Anonymous Edge Representation for Inductive Anomaly Detection in Dynamic Bipartite Graph
Fang, L., Feng, K., Gui, J., Feng, S., & Hu, A. (2023) · Proceedings of the VLDB Endowment · doi:10.14778/3579075.3579088 · Cited by 21
Metadata
- Authors
- Kunegis, J.
- Venue
- Proceedings of the 22nd International Conference on World Wide Web
- Publisher
- ACM
- Published
- 2013-05-13
- Pages
- 1343-1350
- OpenAlex
- W131619556
- Cited by
- 1,479
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 41.29
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: KONECT: the Koblenz network collection. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1145/2487788.2488173
- The paper
- Kunegis, J. (2013). KONECT: the Koblenz network collection. Proceedings of the 22nd International Conference on World Wide Web. https://doi.org/10.1145/2487788.2488173
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.