The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Proceedings of the 22nd international conference on World Wide Web
Abstract
It is our great pleasure to welcome you to the 22nd International World Wide Web Conference -- WWW 2013. The WWW Conference series has been held almost since the creation of the WWW itself, having become the premier forum where key researchers, innovators, decision-makers, technologists, businesses, and standards bodies meet to present their latest works and ideas, and discuss their vision for how the WWW will evolve -- often as a direct result of their own actions and initiatives. The conference series is organized by the International World Wide Web Conferences Steering Committee (IW3C2) in collaboration with Local Organizing Committees and Technical Program Committees. This year the conference is being held in Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, for the first time ever in a Latin American country. We are extremely pleased to offer a top quality program, as can be verified by simply perusing these proceedings and its companion volume. The Research and Practice and Experience tracks present 137 papers in 35 track sessions; the Developers track, 10 papers in 4 sessions; the Demos track, 24 demos in 3 sessions; 100 posters in an ongoing poster exhibition; 12 Doctoral Consortium papers; a W3C track reporting on the latest standardization activities in themes such as Web Performance, eGov and Open Data; and an Industry Track with presentations from major players in the WWW on Big Data and on Patents and Innovation. Complementing this, more recent preliminary results are presented in over 150 papers in 21 Workshops, spanning a myriad of exciting new and existing topics. For those seeking to complement their understanding of the major knowledge areas and research topics associated with the WWW, 22 tutorials are being offered. This program is complemented with several parallel events, such as hackathons, panels, and specialized meetings covering a multitude of new subjects.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Graph embedding techniques, applications, and performance: A survey
Goyal, P., & Ferrara, E. (2018) · Knowledge-Based Systems · doi:10.1016/j.knosys.2018.03.022 · Cited by 1,801
A review of affective computing: From unimodal analysis to multimodal fusion
Poria, S., Cambria, E., Bajpai, R., & Hussain, A. (2017) · Information Fusion · doi:10.1016/j.inffus.2017.02.003 · Cited by 1,644
A review: Knowledge reasoning over knowledge graph
Chen, X., Jia, S., & Xiang, Y. (2020) · Expert Systems with Applications · doi:10.1016/j.eswa.2019.112948 · Cited by 1,035
An overview of online fake news: Characterization, detection, and discussion
Zhang, X., & Ghorbani, A. A. (2020) · Information Processing & Management · doi:10.1016/j.ipm.2019.03.004 · Cited by 997
Social Data: Biases, Methodological Pitfalls, and Ethical Boundaries
Olteanu, A., Castillo, C., Diaz, F., & Kiciman, E. (2016) · doi:10.2139/ssrn.2886526 · Cited by 763
Metadata
- Publisher
- ACM
- Published
- 2013-05-13
- OpenAlex
- W4230792291
- Cited by
- 685
- References
- 0
- Type
- paratext
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Proceedings of the 22nd international conference on World Wide Web. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1145/2488388
- The paper
- Proceedings of the 22nd international conference on World Wide Web. (2013). https://doi.org/10.1145/2488388
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
