The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Low-rank matrix completion using alternating minimization
Abstract
Alternating minimization represents a widely applicable and empirically successful approach for finding low-rank matrices that best fit the given data. For example, for the problem of low-rank matrix completion, this method is believed to be one of the most accurate and efficient, and formed a major component of the winning entry in the Netflix Challenge [17].
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Golub, G. (2012) · doi:10.56021/9781421407944 · Cited by 34,505
Sparse Principal Component Analysis
Zou, H., Hastie, T., & Tibshirani, R. (2006) · Journal of Computational and Graphical Statistics · doi:10.1198/106186006x113430 · Cited by 3,152
Cited by
Non-convex Optimization for Machine Learning
Jain, P., & Kar, P. (2017) · Foundations and Trends® in Machine Learning · doi:10.1561/2200000058 · Cited by 364
Self-citationNonconvex Optimization Meets Low-Rank Matrix Factorization: An Overview
Chi, Y., Lu, Y. M., & Chen, Y. (2019) · IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing · doi:10.1109/tsp.2019.2937282 · Cited by 360
Complete Dictionary Recovery Over the Sphere I: Overview and the Geometric Picture
Sun, J., Qu, Q., & Wright, J. (2017) · IEEE Transactions on Information Theory · doi:10.1109/tit.2016.2632162 · Cited by 213
Low-Rank Matrix Completion for Topological Interference Management by Riemannian Pursuit
Shi, Y., Zhang, J., & Letaief, K. B. (2016) · IEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications · doi:10.1109/twc.2016.2544758 · Cited by 56
Subspace Estimation from Unbalanced and Incomplete Data Matrices: 𝓁2, ∞ Statistical Guarantees
Cai, C., Li, G., Chi, Y., Poor, H. V., & Chen, Y. (2021) · The Annals of Statistics · doi:10.1214/20-aos1986 · Cited by 37
Metadata
- Authors
- Jain, P., Netrapalli, P., & Sanghavi, S.
- Venue
- Proceedings of the forty-fifth annual ACM symposium on Theory of Computing
- Publisher
- ACM
- Published
- 2013-06
- Pages
- 665-674
- OpenAlex
- W2106005123
- Cited by
- 817
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 111.58
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
