The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Proximity 2 -aware ranking for textual, temporal, and geographic queries
Abstract
Temporal and geographic information needs are frequent and important but not well served by standard IR systems. Recent approaches address such needs by extracting and normalizing temporal and geographic expressions from documents. They calculate specific scores for the temporal and/ or geographic parts of a query. However, all approaches assume independence between the different query parts. In this paper, we present a new model to rank documents according to combined textual, temporal, and geographic queries. The independence assumption between the query parts is eliminated by calculating proximity scores. Thus, documents are regarded to be more relevant if terms and expressions satisfying the different query parts occur close to each other in a document. As our evaluations based on the NTCIR-GeoTime data show, our proposed model outperforms baseline models that do not use proximity information.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Strötgen and Gertz 2013 presented a novel ranking approach that takes into account proximity of text, temporal, and geographic query terms.
“Finally [Strötgen and Gertz 2013] presented a novel ranking approach that takes into account the proximity of text, temporal, and geographic query terms in documents”
From Survey of Temporal Information Retrieval and Related Applications (2015) · cites this paper as Strötgen and Gertz 2013
Citations
Cites
No references could be resolved yet.
Research works printed but not linked: 19
- O. Alonso, J. Strötgen, R. Baeza-Yates, and M. Gertz. Temporal Information Retrieval: Challenges and Opportunities. In TWAW'11, pages 1--8, 2011.
- 10.1007/978-3-642-12275-0_5 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1145/1458082.1458320 · DOI
- 10.1145/1871962.1871966 · DOI
- F. Gey, R. Larson, N. Kando, J. Machado, and T. Sakai. NTCIR-GeoTime Overview: Evaluating Geographic and Temporal Search. In NTCIR-8, 2010.
- F. Gey, R. Larson, J. Machado, and M. Yoshioka. NTCIR9-GeoTime Overview -- Evaluating Geographic and Temporal Search: Round 2. In NTCIR-9, 2011.
- 10.1145/956863.956951 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1145/1341012.1341045 · DOI
- J. Machado, B. Martins, and J. Borbinha. LGTE: Lucene Extensions for Geo-Temporal Information Retrieval. In GIIW'09, 2009.
- 10.5555/1394399 · DOI
- 10.5555/1793274.1793347 · DOI
- 10.1080/13658810601169840 · DOI
- 10.5555/1757788.1757808 · DOI
- S. E. Robertson, S. Walker, S. Jones, M. Hancock-Beaulieu, and M. Gatford. Okapi at TREC-3. In TREC-3, 1994.
- 10.1145/2232817.2232859 · DOI
- 10.1007/s10579-012-9179-y · DOI
- J. Strötgen and M. Gertz. Proximity2-aware Ranking for Textual, Temporal, and Geographic Queries (extended version). Technical report, Heidelberg University, 2013.
- 10.1145/1277741.1277794 · DOI
- W. V. Zhang, B. Rey, E. Stipp, and R. Jones. Geomodification in Query Rewriting. In GIR'06, 2006.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Survey of Temporal Information Retrieval and Related Applications
Campos, R., Dias, G., Jorge, A. M., & Jatowt, A. (2015) · ACM Computing Surveys · doi:10.1145/2619088 · Cited by 262
Metadata
- Authors
- Strötgen, J., & Gertz, M.
- Affiliations
- Heidelberg University, Heidelberg, Germany
- Venue
- Proceedings of the 22nd ACM international conference on Information & Knowledge Management
- Publisher
- ACM
- Published
- 2013-10-27
- Pages
- 739-744
- Cited by
- 5
- References
- 0
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review