Cited by 5

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Proximity 2 -aware ranking for textual, temporal, and geographic queries

Strötgen, Jannik, Gertz, Michael·2013·Proceedings of the 22nd ACM international conference on Information & Knowledge Management

Abstract

Temporal and geographic information needs are frequent and important but not well served by standard IR systems. Recent approaches address such needs by extracting and normalizing temporal and geographic expressions from documents. They calculate specific scores for the temporal and/ or geographic parts of a query. However, all approaches assume independence between the different query parts. In this paper, we present a new model to rank documents according to combined textual, temporal, and geographic queries. The independence assumption between the query parts is eliminated by calculating proximity scores. Thus, documents are regarded to be more relevant if terms and expressions satisfying the different query parts occur close to each other in a document. As our evaluations based on the NTCIR-GeoTime data show, our proposed model outperforms baseline models that do not use proximity information.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1145/2505515.2505640

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Strötgen and Gertz 2013 presented a novel ranking approach that takes into account proximity of text, temporal, and geographic query terms.

    “Finally [Strötgen and Gertz 2013] presented a novel ranking approach that takes into account the proximity of text, temporal, and geographic query terms in documents”

    From Survey of Temporal Information Retrieval and Related Applications (2015) · cites this paper as Strötgen and Gertz 2013

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 19

  1. O. Alonso, J. Strötgen, R. Baeza-Yates, and M. Gertz. Temporal Information Retrieval: Challenges and Opportunities. In TWAW'11, pages 1--8, 2011.
  2. 10.1007/978-3-642-12275-0_5 · DOI · Paper page
  3. 10.1145/1458082.1458320 · DOI
  4. 10.1145/1871962.1871966 · DOI
  5. F. Gey, R. Larson, N. Kando, J. Machado, and T. Sakai. NTCIR-GeoTime Overview: Evaluating Geographic and Temporal Search. In NTCIR-8, 2010.
  6. F. Gey, R. Larson, J. Machado, and M. Yoshioka. NTCIR9-GeoTime Overview -- Evaluating Geographic and Temporal Search: Round 2. In NTCIR-9, 2011.
  7. 10.1145/956863.956951 · DOI · Paper page
  8. 10.1145/1341012.1341045 · DOI
  9. J. Machado, B. Martins, and J. Borbinha. LGTE: Lucene Extensions for Geo-Temporal Information Retrieval. In GIIW'09, 2009.
  10. 10.5555/1394399 · DOI
  11. 10.5555/1793274.1793347 · DOI
  12. 10.1080/13658810601169840 · DOI
  13. 10.5555/1757788.1757808 · DOI
  14. S. E. Robertson, S. Walker, S. Jones, M. Hancock-Beaulieu, and M. Gatford. Okapi at TREC-3. In TREC-3, 1994.
  15. 10.1145/2232817.2232859 · DOI
  16. 10.1007/s10579-012-9179-y · DOI
  17. J. Strötgen and M. Gertz. Proximity2-aware Ranking for Textual, Temporal, and Geographic Queries (extended version). Technical report, Heidelberg University, 2013.
  18. 10.1145/1277741.1277794 · DOI
  19. W. V. Zhang, B. Rey, E. Stipp, and R. Jones. Geomodification in Query Rewriting. In GIR'06, 2006.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Strötgen, J., & Gertz, M.
Affiliations
Heidelberg University, Heidelberg, Germany
Venue
Proceedings of the 22nd ACM international conference on Information & Knowledge Management
Publisher
ACM
Published
2013-10-27
Pages
739-744
Cited by
5
References
0

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review