The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Guided GUI testing of android apps with minimal restart and approximate learning
Open accessAbstract
Smartphones and tablets with rich graphical user interfaces (GUI) are becoming increasingly popular. Hundreds of thousands of specialized applications, called apps, are available for such mobile platforms. Manual testing is the most popular technique for testing graphical user interfaces of such apps. Manual testing is often tedious and error-prone. In this paper, we propose an automated technique, called Swift-Hand, for generating sequences of test inputs for Android apps. The technique uses machine learning to learn a model of the app during testing, uses the learned model to generate user inputs that visit unexplored states of the app, and uses the execution of the app on the generated inputs to refine the model. A key feature of the testing algorithm is that it avoids restarting the app, which is a significantly more expensive operation than executing the app on a sequence of inputs. An important insight behind our testing algorithm is that we do not need to learn a precise model of an app, which is often computationally intensive, if our goal is to simply guide test execution into unexplored parts of the state space. We have implemented our testing algorithm in a publicly available tool for Android apps written in Java. Our experimental results show that we can achieve significantly better coverage than traditional random testing and L*-based testing in a given time budget. Our algorithm also reaches peak coverage faster than both random and L*-based testing.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Guided, stochastic model-based GUI testing of Android apps
Su, T., Meng, G., Chen, Y., Wu, K., Yang, W., Yao, Y., Pu, G., Liu, Y., & Su, Z. (2017) · Proceedings of the 2017 11th Joint Meeting on Foundations of Software Engineering · doi:10.1145/3106237.3106298 · Cited by 371
MobiGUITAR: Automated Model-Based Testing of Mobile Apps
Amalfitano, D., Fasolino, A. R., Tramontana, P., Ta, B. D., & Memon, A. M. (2015) · IEEE Software · doi:10.1109/ms.2014.55 · Cited by 278
Machine learning applied to software testing: A systematic mapping study
Durelli, V. H. S., Durelli, R. S., Borges, S. S., Endo, A. T., Eler, M. M., Dias, D. R. C., & Guimaraes, M. P. (2019) · IEEE Transactions on Reliability · doi:10.1109/tr.2019.2892517 · Cited by 207
Metadata
- Authors
- Choi, W., Necula, G., & Sen, K.
- Venue
- Proceedings of the 2013 ACM SIGPLAN international conference on Object oriented programming systems languages & applications
- Publisher
- ACM
- Published
- 2013-10-29
- Pages
- 623-640
- OpenAlex
- W2091932246
- Cited by
- 315
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 19.99
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Guided GUI testing of android apps with minimal restart and approximate learning. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1145/2509136.2509552
- The paper
- Choi, W., Necula, G., & Sen, K. (2013). Guided GUI testing of android apps with minimal restart and approximate learning. Proceedings of the 2013 ACM SIGPLAN international conference on Object oriented programming systems languages & applications. https://doi.org/10.1145/2509136.2509552
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.