The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Dynamic itemset counting and implication rules for market basket data
Abstract
We consider the problem of analyzing market-basket data and present several important contributions. First, we present a new algorithm for finding large itemsets which uses fewer passes over the data than classic algorithms, and yet uses fewer candidate itemsets than methods based on sampling. We investigate the idea of item reordering, which can improve the low-level efficiency of the algorithm. Second, we present a new way of generating "implication rules," which are normalized based on both the antecedent and the consequent and are truly implications (not simply a measure of co-occurrence), and we show how they produce more intuitive results than other methods. Finally, we show how different characteristics of real data, as opposed to synthetic data, can dramatically affect the performance of the system and the form of the results. 1 Introduction Within the area of data mining, the problem of deriving associations from data has recently received a great deal of attention. The prob...
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Mining association rules between sets of items in large databases
Agrawal, R., Imieliński, T., & Swami, A. (1993) · Proceedings of the 1993 ACM SIGMOD international conference on Management of data · doi:10.1145/170035.170072 · Cited by 14,907
Cited by
Data mining: concepts and techniques
(2012) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.49-3305 · Cited by 28,531
Data Mining: Practical Machine Learning Tools and Techniques
(2011) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/c2009-0-19715-5 · Cited by 25,437
Automatic subspace clustering of high dimensional data for data mining applications
Agrawal, R., Gehrke, J., Gunopulos, D., & Raghavan, P. (1998) · Proceedings of the 1998 ACM SIGMOD international conference on Management of data · doi:10.1145/276304.276314 · Cited by 2,412
Frequent pattern mining: current status and future directions
Han, J., Cheng, H., Xin, D., & Yan, X. (2007) · Data Mining and Knowledge Discovery · doi:10.1007/s10618-006-0059-1 · Cited by 1,380
Discovering Frequent Closed Itemsets for Association Rules
Pasquier, N., Bastide, Y., Taouil, R., & Lakhal, L. (1999) · Lecture Notes in Computer Science · doi:10.1007/3-540-49257-7_25 · Cited by 1,378
Metadata
- Authors
- Brin, S., Motwani, R., Ullman, J. D., & Tsur, S.
- Venue
- Proceedings of the 1997 ACM SIGMOD international conference on Management of data - SIGMOD '97
- Publisher
- ACM Press
- Published
- 1997
- Pages
- 255-264
- ISSN
- 0730-8078 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2037965136
- Cited by
- 1,951
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 43.15
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Dynamic itemset counting and implication rules for market basket data. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1145/253260.253325
- The paper
- Brin, S., Motwani, R., Ullman, J. D., & Tsur, S. (1997). Dynamic itemset counting and implication rules for market basket data. Proceedings of the 1997 ACM SIGMOD international conference on Management of data - SIGMOD '97. https://doi.org/10.1145/253260.253325
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.