The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Beyond market baskets: generalizing association rules to correlations
Abstract
One of the most well-studied problems in data mining is mining for association rules in market basket data. Association rules, whose significance is measured via support and confidence, are intended to identify rules of the type, “A customer purchasing item A often also purchases item B.” Motivated by the goal of generalizing beyond market baskets and the association rules used with them, we develop the notion of mining rules that identify correlations (generalizing associations), and we consider both the absence and presence of items as a basis for generating rules. We propose measuring significance of associations via the chi-squared test for correlation from classical statistics. This leads to a measure that is upward closed in the itemset lattice, enabling us to reduce the mining problem to the search for a border between correlated and uncorrelated itemsets in the lattice. We develop pruning strategies and devise an efficient algorithm for the resulting problem. We demonstrate its effectiveness by testing it on census data and finding term dependence in a corpus of text documents, as well as on synthetic data.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Mining association rules between sets of items in large databases
Agrawal, R., Imieliński, T., & Swami, A. (1993) · Proceedings of the 1993 ACM SIGMOD international conference on Management of data · doi:10.1145/170035.170072 · Cited by 14,907
Set-oriented mining for association rules in relational databases
Houtsma, M., & Swami, A. (2002) · Proceedings of the Eleventh International Conference on Data Engineering · doi:10.1109/icde.1995.380413 · Cited by 263
Cited by
Data mining: concepts and techniques
(2012) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.49-3305 · Cited by 28,531
Mining frequent patterns without candidate generation
Han, J., Pei, J., & Yin, Y. (2000) · ACM SIGMOD Record · doi:10.1145/335191.335372 · Cited by 6,402
Frequent pattern mining: current status and future directions
Han, J., Cheng, H., Xin, D., & Yan, X. (2007) · Data Mining and Knowledge Discovery · doi:10.1007/s10618-006-0059-1 · Cited by 1,380
Anonymizing transaction databases for publication
Xu, Y., Wang, K., Fu, A. W.-C., & Yu, P. S. (2008) · Proceedings of the 14th ACM SIGKDD international conference on Knowledge discovery and data mining · doi:10.1145/1401890.1401982 · Cited by 187
Constrained frequent pattern mining: a pattern-growth view
Pei, J., & Han, J. (2002) · ACM SIGKDD Explorations Newsletter · doi:10.1145/568574.568580 · Cited by 133
Metadata
- Authors
- Brin, S., Motwani, R., & Silverstein, C.
- Venue
- Proceedings of the 1997 ACM SIGMOD international conference on Management of data - SIGMOD '97
- Publisher
- ACM Press
- Published
- 1997
- Pages
- 265-276
- ISSN
- 0730-8078 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2210278139
- Cited by
- 1,281
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 28.10
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Beyond market baskets: generalizing association rules to correlations. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1145/253260.253327
- The paper
- Brin, S., Motwani, R., & Silverstein, C. (1997). Beyond market baskets: generalizing association rules to correlations. Proceedings of the 1997 ACM SIGMOD international conference on Management of data - SIGMOD '97. https://doi.org/10.1145/253260.253327
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.