The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Scalable parallel data mining for association rules
Abstract
One of the important problems in data mining is discovering association rules from databases of transactions where each transaction consists of a set of items. The most time consuming operation in this discovery process is the computation of the frequency of the occurrences of interesting subset of items (called candidates) in the database of transactions. To prune the exponentially large space of candidates, most existing algorithms, consider only those candidates that have a user defined minimum support. Even with the pruning, the task of finding all association rules requires a lot of computation power and time. Parallel computers offer a potential solution to the computation requirement of this task, provided efficient and scalable parallel algorithms can be designed. In this paper, we present two new parallel algorithms for mining association rules. The Intelligent Data Distribution algorithm efficiently uses aggregate memory of the parallel computer by employing intelligent candidate partitioning scheme and uses efficient communication mechanism to move data among the processors. The Hybrid Distribution algorithm further improves upon the Intelligent Data Distribution algorithm by dynamically partitioning the candidate set to maintain good load balance. The experimental results on a Cray T3D parallel computer show that the Hybrid Distribution algorithm scales linearly and exploits the aggregate memory better and can generate more association rules with a single scan of database per pass.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Mining association rules between sets of items in large databases
Agrawal, R., Imieliński, T., & Swami, A. (1993) · Proceedings of the 1993 ACM SIGMOD international conference on Management of data · doi:10.1145/170035.170072 · Cited by 14,907
Mining association rules between sets of items in large databases
Agrawal, R., Imieliński, T., & Swami, A. (1993) · ACM SIGMOD Record · doi:10.1145/170036.170072 · Cited by 4,551
Set-oriented mining for association rules in relational databases
Houtsma, M., & Swami, A. (2002) · Proceedings of the Eleventh International Conference on Data Engineering · doi:10.1109/icde.1995.380413 · Cited by 263
Cited by
Data mining: concepts and techniques
(2012) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.49-3305 · Cited by 28,531
A Data-Clustering Algorithm on Distributed Memory Multiprocessors
Dhillon, I. S., & Modha, D. S. (2002) · Lecture Notes in Computer Science · doi:10.1007/3-540-46502-2_13 · Cited by 386
Metadata
- Authors
- Han, E.-H., Karypis, G., & Kumar, V.
- Venue
- Proceedings of the 1997 ACM SIGMOD international conference on Management of data - SIGMOD '97
- Publisher
- ACM Press
- Published
- 1997
- Pages
- 277-288
- ISSN
- 0730-8078 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2137860515
- Cited by
- 262
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 18.60
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Scalable parallel data mining for association rules. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1145/253260.253330
- The paper
- Han, E.-H., Karypis, G., & Kumar, V. (1997). Scalable parallel data mining for association rules. Proceedings of the 1997 ACM SIGMOD international conference on Management of data - SIGMOD '97. https://doi.org/10.1145/253260.253330
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.